server as the client already requires a server to be
started.
Many thanks,
D.
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/Client-server-in-the-same-VM-tp2559p2605.html
Sent from the Apache Ignite Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
butedConfiguration);
}
}
---
Running this class, you can see the final output as
[09:44:42] Ignite node started OK (id=b02f1f9b, grid=DISTRIBUTED_CLUSTER)
[09:44:42] Topology snapshot [ver=2, servers=1, clients=1, CPUs=8,
heap=3.5GB]
Thanks,
D.
--
View this message in context:
http://apa
ver=2, servers=1, clients=1, CPUs=8,
> heap=3.5GB]
Thanks,
D.
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/Client-server-in-the-same-VM-tp2559p2576.html
Sent from the Apache Ignite Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hi Daniel,
It's easy to support your use case if to configure multicast [1] or
static IP finders in a particular way.
Please refer to these discussions happened earlier:
http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/How-keep-separate-different-grid-instances-on-the-same-network-td1609.html
ht
Hi there,
I have an application where I need to share some data between all nodes, so
we created a cluster with REPLICATED caches, so far so good.
There are other pieces of data that we need to use that we don't need/want
to keep local, so we are trying to setup a different cluster and let the
ap
