Re: Byte[] serialization

2016-09-15 Thread vkulichenko
Binarylizable is usually used when there is a need for custom serialization logic, it doesn't affect the performance. It looks like you can go with default behavior. -Val -- View this message in context: http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/Byte-serialization-tp7768p7786.html

Re: Byte[] serialization

2016-09-15 Thread styriver
between 90k and 300k. What configuration would offer the best performance for serialization. Right now I am thinking of removing the Binarylizable interface and just going with default binary serialization. -- View this message in context: http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/Byte

Re: Byte[] serialization

2016-09-15 Thread styriver
y("image", image); writer.writeUuid("id", id); writer.writeString("pageFormat", pageFormat); writer.writeString("documentId", documentId); writer.writeInt("pageNumber", pageNumber); } -- View this message in context: htt

Byte[] serialization

2016-09-15 Thread Scott Tyriver
Hello One of the objects I am caching has a class member that contains a byte[] (png image). Are there examples of how to serialize/deserialize this. I am getting this warning when I look at it in debug mode WARNING: Class "com.imaging.cache.beans.TiffPage" cannot be serialized using BinaryMar