Re: Size of Data(Keys) are doubled when using CACHE in REPLICATED mode

mCache = node.GetOrCreateCache(CACHE_NAME); /*Get size*/ mcache.size(); >This gives us the size or no of records. Thank you, Ali. -- Sent from: http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/

Re: Local node is not added in baseline topology

127.0.0.1 192.168.111.111:7912 Thank you, Ali. -- Sent from: http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/

Size of Data(Keys) are doubled when using CACHE in REPLICATED mode

Hello, 1-I have two servers one on local and other on remote host. Both nodes are added to Baseline Topology. 2-I have started the cache in replicated mode on both the server nodes. The data is replicated on both nodes properly however when both nodes are running the size of data in node shown is d

Re: Local node is not added in baseline topology

eline topology. And Currently I am using below commands to add a node to baseline topology and auto adjust respectively. control.sh --baseline add consistentID control.sh --baseline auto_adjust enable timeout 5000 Please suggest. Thank you, Ali -- Sent from: http://apache-ignite-users.705

Local node is not added in baseline topology

control.sh --baseline add from the code. Thankyou, Ali. -- Sent from: http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/

Re: Local node is not included in Baseline Topology and will not be used for data storage. Use control.(sh|bat) script or IgniteCluster interface to include the node to Baseline Topology.

Hello, I have below scenario 1)I have two server nodes i.e one on local machine and one on remote host. 2)When I start the first node the local node is added in the Baseline topology:Here adc1c71b-c21b-47aa-8be6-6fa5ebaaa035 is the local node. Current topology version: 2 (Coordinator: Consistent

Local node is not included in Baseline Topology and will not be used for data storage. Use control.(sh|bat) script or IgniteCluster interface to include the node to Baseline Topology.

dd the local node to the Baseline Topology using C++ code. I have found out a java api to do so but my requirement is to add a node to baseline topology from C++ Code. If there is any way to do this please suggest. Thank you. Ali. -- Sent from: http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/

Java Heap

avoid the doubling of memory. Regards, Ali. -- Sent from: http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/

Unsubscribe

Please Unsubscribe me. Regards, Nick Kalbali

Re: Index performance

is property doesn't work for SQL queries, and, actually, for a > default off-heap cache since version 2.0 at all: > > > > Evgenii > > 2017-12-04 16:36 GMT+03:00 Ali <mailto:alimovalis...@gmail.com>>: > Hi! > > I found poor sql index performance and CPU

Index performance

Hi! I found poor sql index performance and CPU utilisation in ignite 2.3 version when try to benchmark cluster for performance. Cluster configuration: 6 x 2 E5-2600v2 256GB 10GB link 1 x 4 E7 node (edge) from which tests are running Ignite config

DML sql transaction

Hello! Does Ignite open transaction for DML operations by default, even if transaction is not open programmatically? P.S. CacheAtomicityMode is TRANSACTIONAL

PersistentStore problems

Hi! I have problem with build-in persistent store on Ignite 2.1, on restarting Ignite with already existing data (on disk) retrieve such error SEVERE: Failed to reinitialize local partitions (preloading will be stopped): GridDhtPartitionExchangeId [topVer=AffinityTopologyVersion [topVer=1, mi

Re: CacheMetrics Offheap size

P.S. Ignite version 2.1.0 With best regards Alisher Alimov alimovalis...@gmail.com > On 28 Jul 2017, at 15:20, Ali wrote: > > Hello! > > I have problem with retrieving actual allocated size in offheap for cache, > CacheMetrics#offHeapAllocatedSize always return 0 >

CacheMetrics Offheap size

Hello! I have problem with retrieving actual allocated size in offheap for cache, CacheMetrics#offHeapAllocatedSize always return 0 CacheConfiguration: cacheConfiguration.setBackups(1); cacheConfiguration.setAtomicityMode(CacheAtomicityMode.TRANSACTIONAL); cacheConfiguration.setCacheMode(Cache

Distributed SQL grid concerns

Hi, I'm considering to use Ignite 2.0.1 as a distributed SQL grid on top of a commonly used relational DB server. The domain requires strict transactional semantics since it's a payment information system. I quickly went through Ignite's user guide and it seems like all the necessary ingredients a