Re: Disable WriteBehind

2017-04-06 Thread waterg
I have two caches. The application takes the first cache as input and output value to the second cache. The first cache has readThrough only. Part of the configurations for second caches are below: There are also two indexes on this cache. The other case is to set writeThrough and writ

Re: How to troubleshoot a slow client node get()

2017-04-06 Thread nragon
Sorry to bump into this thread but I could really use an hand in this one as it is a major problem. http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/Client-near-cache-with-Apache-Flink-td11627.html It's about client get() also. Thanks -- View this message in context: http://apache-ignite-users.

Re: Issue with Scan query

2017-04-06 Thread Nikolai Tikhonov
Hi! Could you share your code as simple maven project? -- View this message in context: http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/Issue-with-Scan-query-tp11773p11790.html Sent from the Apache Ignite Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Disable WriteBehind

2017-04-06 Thread Nikolai Tikhonov
It's strange. Could you share your configuration for both case? Also could you describe more your case? On Wed, Apr 5, 2017 at 8:45 PM, waterg wrote: > Thank you for the reply. > Yes, I disabled both write through and write behind. > We're trying evaluate the application's performance on ignite

Re: IgniteCacheProxy connection failure in REPLICATAED mode

2017-04-06 Thread Baskar Sikkayan
unsubscribe On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 2:05 AM, rick_tem wrote: > Hi, > > I have a cache configuration that looks like this: > > > value="MCache" /> > value="REPLICATED" /> >

Re: IgniteCacheProxy connection failure in REPLICATAED mode

2017-04-06 Thread Andrey Mashenkov
Hi Rick, Looks like it is fixed [1] in master and will be available in 2.0 version. You can try to apply a patch to 1.9 version. PFA patch. [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4473 On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 12:05 PM, rick_tem wrote: > Hi, > > I have a cache configuration that looks l

Re: External data sources

2017-04-06 Thread Dmitri Bronnikov
Thanks, Andrey, I know it doesn't just work out of the box, but what's the best way to add something like that? It's a fairly common feature, Oracle has external tables, Presto has a plug-in mechanism that allows, among other things, to pushdown predicates to the external table driver. -- View t

Re: External data sources

2017-04-06 Thread Andrey Mashenkov
Hi Dmitri, There is no way to make SQL join with external data source. SQL engine requires all data should be in cache. On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 1:48 AM, Dmitri Bronnikov wrote: > What's the best way to implement SQL that joins an Ignite cache with an > external data source, e.g. a Cassandra col

Re: Pessimistic TXN did not release lock on a key, all subsequent txns failed

2017-04-06 Thread bintisepaha
Andrey, We start the caches only at server start up time. 2 of our caches are replicated, all other caches are partitioned with 1 backup. Do you think replicated caches might be causing this issue, when clients leave and join the cluster? All server nodes start with the same cache config. All cl

Re: Client got stucked on get operation

2017-04-06 Thread Andrey Mashenkov
Hi Alper, I see no starvation here. Looks like WriteBehindStore waits for its queue has flushed. Threaddump is needed to understand if Flusher threads also waits for smth. On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 4:40 PM, Alper Tekinalp wrote: > Hi Andrey. > > Ignite logs are at the attachment. > > Interruption

Re: Client got stucked on get operation

2017-04-06 Thread Andrey Mashenkov
Hi Alper, Would you please provide full treaddump and full log? On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 4:08 PM, nragon wrote: > Hi Andrew, > > Please note that the same flink job without ignite runs around 30k/s with > ignite get method goes to 2k/s. If you don't mind taking a look at > http://apache-ignite-us

Re: Client got stucked on get operation

2017-04-06 Thread nragon
Hi Andrew, Please note that the same flink job without ignite runs around 30k/s with ignite get method goes to 2k/s. If you don't mind taking a look at http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/Client-near-cache-with-Apache-Flink-td11627.html. I only said it was related because of the thread

Re: Asp.net client reconnect problem

2017-04-06 Thread Alper Tekinalp
Hi. All segmentation issues that I encountered were due to long GC pauses. Maybe that can be a clue. Regards. On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 3:40 PM, Pavel Tupitsyn wrote: > Igniters, there is a node segmentation in the log, can someone with > experience in this area step in? > This is not related to

Re: Client got stucked on get operation

2017-04-06 Thread Alper Tekinalp
Hi. As I found from logs one of out threads are interrupted and had an exception: 30/Mar/2017 15:56:03 ERROR 133548100 [DeploymentWorker-0] org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.datastreamer.DataStreamerImpl(L:495) - DataStreamer operation failed. java.lang.InterruptedException at java.uti

Re: Asp.net client reconnect problem

2017-04-06 Thread Pavel Tupitsyn
Igniters, there is a node segmentation in the log, can someone with experience in this area step in? This is not related to ASP.NET and .NET, I believe. On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 1:45 PM, ozgurnevres wrote: > Any suggestion? :( > > > > -- > View this message in context: http://apache-ignite-users.

Re: Client got stucked on get operation

2017-04-06 Thread Andrey Mashenkov
Hi, Looks like not related. Most of time spent in non-ignite methods, but in flink serializer. Also I see a contention in flink Serializer. On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 2:27 PM, nragon wrote: > Hi, > > Might be related with: > http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/Client- > near-cache-with-A

Re: Client got stucked on get operation

2017-04-06 Thread nragon
Hi, Might be related with: http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/Client-near-cache-with-Apache-Flink-td11627.html I've attached my jfr file along with some other metrics and a test class with the same configurations. Thanks -- View this message in context: http://apache-ignite-users

Re: Client got stucked on get operation

2017-04-06 Thread Andrey Mashenkov
Hi Alper, So, you have standalone Ignite instance on "cache server" and grid of 2 instances on "app servers". How are you access this standalone instance from "app servers"? With client ignite instances? Would you please provide its config? When you see some threads stucked on remote operation, t

Re: Asp.net client reconnect problem

2017-04-06 Thread ozgurnevres
Any suggestion? :( -- View this message in context: http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/Asp-net-client-reconnect-problem-tp11735p11772.html Sent from the Apache Ignite Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Client near cache with Apache Flink

2017-04-06 Thread nragon
Might be related: http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/Client-got-stucked-on-get-operation-td11313.html -- View this message in context: http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/Client-near-cache-with-Apache-Flink-tp11627p11771.html Sent from the Apache Ignite Users mailing list

Re: Timestamp is not stored correctly with Cassandra

2017-04-06 Thread Nikolai Tikhonov
Hi Jenny, Could you change type your field in POJO class to java.utile.Date? It's solve your problem? On Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 7:12 PM, Nikolai Tikhonov wrote: > Hello, > > Jenny, > I'm bit confused. Which type do you have in cassandra table? timestamp? As > I see from http://docs.datastax.com/en

Re: [GridCachePartitionExchangeManager] Pending transaction deadlock detection futures

2017-04-06 Thread ght230
I have created a JIRA for that. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4924. -- View this message in context: http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/GridCachePartitionExchangeManager-Pending-transaction-deadlock-detection-futures-tp11362p11767.html Sent from the Apache Ignite User

IgniteCacheProxy connection failure in REPLICATAED mode

2017-04-06 Thread rick_tem
Hi, I have a cache configuration that looks like this:

Re: Client got stucked on get operation

2017-04-06 Thread Alper Tekinalp
Hi Andrey. You can find configuration files and basic structure in the attachment. App servers connects cache server as client programmatically so no configuration for that. On Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 6:15 PM, Andrey Mashenkov wrote: > Hi Alper, > > Still not enough clear. Would you please share a