Hi Stamatis,
thanks for bringing up this topic, I basically agree on everything you
wrote.
I just wanted to add that this kind of proposal might sound harsh, because
in many contexts upgrading is a complex process, but it's in nobody's
interest to keep release branches that are missing important
f
Hi Team,
My experience with the Iceberg community shows that there are some sizeable
userbase around Hive 2.x. I have seen patches, contributions to Hive 2.3.x
branches, and the tests are in much better shape there.
I would definitely vote for EOL Hive 1.x, but until we have a stable 4.x, I
wo
Agree to Peter above. I know quite a few projects such as Spark,
Iceberg and Trino/Presto are depending on Hive 2.x and 3.x, and
periodically they may need new fixes in these. Upgrading them to use
4.x seems not an option for now since the core classified artifact has
been removed and the shading i
Shall we put the core/shading to the blocker for 4.0.0?
Do we have a jira for it?
Thanks Sun Chao for bringing this up!
Peter
On Mon, May 9, 2022, 19:21 Chao Sun wrote:
> Agree to Peter above. I know quite a few projects such as Spark,
> Iceberg and Trino/Presto are depending on Hive 2.x and 3
Agree to Peter and sunchao..
Even we are using the hive 3.x, we might contribute on bugfixes.
Even I am +1 on 1.x EOL as it's hard to maintain so many releases and time to
user's migrate to 2.x and 3.x.
On 09/05/22, 10:51 PM, "Chao Sun" wrote:
Agree to Peter above. I know quite a few p
