Re: concat_ws() UDF

2013-12-28 Thread Alexey Zotov
econd and fourth value by **. Hence you got abc8675309 > > Ritesh > > > On Fri, Dec 27, 2013 at 12:13 AM, Alexey Zotov wrote: > >> Sorry, but in my previous email there was some misleading due to text >> formatting. >> >> So, there are tests for conc

Re: concat_ws() UDF

2013-12-28 Thread Ritesh Agrawal
my previous email there was some misleading due to text > formatting. > > So, there are tests for concat_ws() UDF: > https://github.com/apache/hive/blob/trunk/ql/src/test/results/clientpositive/udf_concat_ws.q.out. > One of tests (78 line) contains the following query: > >> SELEC

Re: concat_ws() UDF

2013-12-27 Thread Alexey Zotov
Sorry, but in my previous email there was some misleading due to text formatting. So, there are tests for concat_ws() UDF: https://github.com/apache/hive/blob/trunk/ql/src/test/results/clientpositive/udf_concat_ws.q.out. One of tests (78 line) contains the following query: > SELECT concat

concat_ws() UDF

2013-12-26 Thread Alexey Zotov
Hello Guys, historically concat_ws() UDF was added in the scope of https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-682 ticket. I have a simple question about its implementation. According to above ticket's description it should have behavior like MySQL implementation ( http://dev.mysql.com/doc/r