At the last Hive contributor meeting, we tentatively resolved to do a
time-based release ASAP since so much has buffered up already. There were
suggestions for various features we might want to consider getting into 0.7,
but none were identified as "must". Some features (such as indexing) are
+1 for shorter release cycles.
Currently, is it time based or feature based ? If time based, whats
the timeline for 0.7 and if its feature based, which features are
"must" for 0.7 release?
Ashutosh
On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 11:42, John Sichi wrote:
> We branched 0.6 quite early and by that point we
We branched 0.6 quite early and by that point we were only backporting blockers
for the release.
We're hoping we can make the 0.7 release cycle a lot shorter, and HIVE-1226
will be in there for sure.
JVS
On Nov 4, 2010, at 2:27 PM, Sanjit Jhala wrote:
> Thanks John. Just curious, I see the la
Hi Sanjit,
On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 11:27 AM, Sanjit Jhala wrote:
> Thanks John. Just curious, I see the last commit for HIVE-1226 was almost a
> month before the 0.6.0 release and I'm wondering why it didn't get into the
> release.
We created the 0.6 branch several months before the actual 0.6
Thanks John. Just curious, I see the last commit for HIVE-1226 was almost a
month before the 0.6.0 release and I'm wondering why it didn't get into the
release.
Also, I agree theres a lot of duplicated code and will be happy to help out
in a refactoring effort.
-Sanjit
On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 11:
HIVE-1226 (support for pushing filters down into storage handlers) is only in
trunk (not 0.6).
Separately: as a followup to HIVE-1434, it would be good to plan a refactoring
across the handlers for HBase/Hypertable/Cassandra since there is a lot of
duplicated code.
JVS
On Nov 4, 2010, at 1:3
Hi,
I'm taking another pass over the Hypertable Hive storage handler and adding
a bit more functionality to it (including regexp filtering). I was also
planning to upgrade the Hive version it uses from something between 0.4 &
0.5 to 0.6. In this regard, my preference is to upgrade to 0.6 but I'm
