Yes, your query makes sense and should already work as expected. The idea of
HIVE-1994 is that once the new annotation is available, we'll make a guarantee
that your query as written below will continue to work in the face of any new
optimizer changes (with the downside being that in some cases
Thank you, John.
It's not quite clear from the page whether my solution:
1. makes sense
2. works now
3. will work in the future if the issue is resolved/implemented
Could you elaborate?
Also, there is no mentioning of UDF object sharing (between mappers) in the
current implementation. Is this a
Please see the discussion in this JIRA issue:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-1994
JVS
On Feb 21, 2011, at 10:45 PM, Igor Tatarinov wrote:
> I would like to implement the moving average as a UDF (instead of a streaming
> reducer). Here is what I am thinking. Please let me know if I
