ley mailto:omal...@apache.org>>
Reply-To: "user@hive.apache.org<mailto:user@hive.apache.org>"
mailto:user@hive.apache.org>>
Date: Friday, May 24, 2013 2:15 PM
To: "user@hive.apache.org<mailto:user@hive.apache.org>"
mailto:user@hive.apache.org>>
Su
ow();
> }
>
> Am I missing something here about the synchronized(this) ? Perhaps I am
> looking in the wrong place.
>
> Thanks,
> agp
>
>
> From: Owen O'Malley
> Reply-To: "user@hive.apache.org"
> Date: Friday, May 24, 2013 2:15 PM
> T
o:user@hive.apache.org>"
mailto:user@hive.apache.org>>
Date: Friday, May 24, 2013 2:15 PM
To: "user@hive.apache.org<mailto:user@hive.apache.org>"
mailto:user@hive.apache.org>>
Subject: Re: OrcFile writing failing with multiple threads
Currently, ORC writers, like t
Currently, ORC writers, like the Java collections API don't lock
themselves. You should synchronize on the writer before adding a row. I'm
open to making the writers synchronized.
-- Owen
On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 11:39 AM, Andrew Psaltis <
andrew.psal...@webtrends.com> wrote:
> All,
> I have a
All,
I have a test application that is attempting to add rows to an OrcFile from
multiple threads, however, every time I do I get exceptions with stack traces
like the following:
java.lang.IndexOutOfBoundsException: Index 4 is outside of 0..5
at org.apache.hadoop.hive.ql.io.orc.DynamicIntArray.g
