Re: LIKE Statement

2012-05-14 Thread John Omernik
Well the link provided isn't really about what I originally asked about. I have not come across a SQL implementation (Postgres, MySQL, or MSSQL are the ones I have experience in) where LIKE was "by default" case sensitive with wildcards. That being said, I'm not the type to based my assertions on

Re: LIKE Statement

2012-05-14 Thread Keith Wiley
Thanks for the followup. Keith Wiley kwi...@keithwiley.com keithwiley.commusic.keithwiley.com "I used to be with it, but then they changed what it was. Now, what I'm with isn't it, and what's it seems we

Re: LIKE Statement

2012-05-14 Thread Edward Capriolo
function extended rlike; OK str rlike regexp - Returns true if str matches regexp and false otherwise Synonyms: regexp Example: > SELECT 'fb' rlike '.*' FROM src LIMIT 1; true Time taken: 0.081 seconds hive> On 5/14/12, Keith Wiley wrote: > On Apr 4, 2012, at 0

Re: LIKE Statement

2012-05-14 Thread Keith Wiley
On Apr 4, 2012, at 06:40 , John Omernik wrote: > I think the like statement should be changed to be case-insensitive to match > it's function in other DBMS Thoughts? Out of curiosity, was there any activity on this issue? I see John's original post in the archives (~5

LIKE Statement

2012-04-04 Thread John Omernik
I did a test today: select * from table where 'hello' like '%el%' limit 10; I got 10 rows from my table select * from table where 'HELLO' like '%el%' limit 10; I got 0 rows from the same table. Based on this, it would appear the like statement is