, LUTTER, Steffen
mailto:steffen.lut...@sap.com>> wrote:
Hi Mark,
Correct, I just did some tests and the cast is the way to go. While for
comparison operations (equal, diff, ...) implicit casts work, this is not the
case for the IN clause. I think it should, as eventually this just translates
fferent is that equal can cast operands to make equals
work but that may not be true for IN. FWIW, this is me just speculating, I
haven't looked at the code just yet.
Perhaps, you could explicit casting to get around this?
On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 7:36 AM, LUTTER, Steffen
mailto:steffen.lut..
r [mailto:nitinpawar...@gmail.com]
Sent: 05 April 2013 16:11
To: user@hive.apache.org
Subject: Re: Syntax for filters on timstamp data type
I am not sure IN clause supports executing functions in the query
did it fail when you tried less than greater than type
On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 7:36
Hi,
I have a question regarding filters on timestamps. The syntax seems to be
UNIX_TIMESTAMP('-MM-dd hh:mm:ss'), is there another way to express a
datetime type? The problem is that I get an exception when using the IN
syntax, while the equal comparison works without problems.
Example: SE
Hi guys,
Does anybody know if the methods getTimestamp(int columnIndex, Calendar cal)
and getTimestamp(String columnName, Calendar cal) are going to be implemented
in a future version? I am grateful that timestamp is now supported in 0.10.0
(thanks to the devs!!!) and for now I will create a wo
