s point, schema 2 will make you enable predicate pushdown. The
> performance difference depends mainly on the data layout/if column is
> sorted or not.
>
> Thanks
> Prasanth Jayachandran
>
> On Sep 8, 2014, at 6:16 AM, Abhishek Agarwal wrote:
>
> Hi all,
> I have few ques
access nested columns?
In general, is there a significant performance difference in following
schemas with regards to query execution and storage?
Schema1:
{
string a;
struct b {
string b1;
string b2;
}
}
Schema 2:
{
string a;
string b.b1;
string b.b2;
}
--
Regards,
Abhishek Agarwal
+ Re-sending as delivery of earlier mail failed.
On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 5:14 PM, Abhishek Agarwal
wrote:
> Hi All,
> Is it possible to create a table with Parquet as storage mechanism, with
> schema being supplied from thrift IDL rather than metastore?
>
> Something like be
