Re: HiveServer2

2013-11-18 Thread Roberto Congiu
Yeah, we had issues with zk locking toobut this workaround works pretty well and our ops won't get paged at 4am :) On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 2:16 PM, Edward Capriolo wrote: > Yikes: I personally found that the most problematic thing was hiveserver + > zk locking, if you do not need that turn i

Re: HiveServer2

2013-11-18 Thread Edward Capriolo
Yikes: I personally found that the most problematic thing was hiveserver + zk locking, if you do not need that turn it off. Other then that we just wrote a good nagios check..it runs a query (one that does not invoke a map reduce job). That seems to spot the problems quickly and allow our ops to re

Re: HiveServer2

2013-11-18 Thread Roberto Congiu
We've also had issues with both hiveserver1 and 2 crashing because of heap exhaustion, but instead of restarting it periodically we took a different approach, that is, abstracting the part of the interface we needed, and implemented an adapter that implements the same method as thrift, but forking

Re: HiveServer2

2013-11-18 Thread Edward Capriolo
Thanks for pointing out any issue. HiveServer1 is significantly less robust. We have run HS1 behind a load balancer/proxy and rotated/restarted "angry" instances. On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 3:59 PM, Stephen Sprague wrote: > A word of warning for users of HiveServer2 - version 0.11 at least. This >

HiveServer2

2013-11-18 Thread Stephen Sprague
A word of warning for users of HiveServer2 - version 0.11 at least. This puppy has the ability crash and/or hang your server with a memory leak. Apparently its not new since googling shows this discussed before and i see reference to a workaround here: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/

Re: Running Hive 0.12.0 with Hadoop 2.2

2013-11-18 Thread Asher Devuyst
Unsubscribe On Nov 14, 2013 2:36 AM, "Bill Q" wrote: > Hi, > Does Hive 0.12 run on Hadoop 2.2? if it does, anything special about > installing it or running hive? Will hive start a M/R ApplicationMaster by > itself or should I start one for it? > > Many thanks. > > > Bill >