Re: put to WAL and scan/get operation concurrency

2011-05-06 Thread pob
I think splitting doesnt distribute your read load. With read load distribution i mean you can access same data on let say 3 different nodes (RS) - if the dfs replication is set to 3. What Hbase doesnt handle, am i right? 2011/5/6 Todd Lipcon > On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 11:19 AM, pob wrote: >

Re: put to WAL and scan/get operation concurrency

2011-05-06 Thread Todd Lipcon
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 11:19 AM, pob wrote: > > > The data for those regions is replicated, but only 1 region server > > does the management of that data. > > > > > So does it mean, there isnt "scalling for reads"? {mean higher replica -> > better read throughput} > Reads are scaled by splitting

Re: put to WAL and scan/get operation concurrency

2011-05-06 Thread pob
gt; > > > > > > ____________________ > > From: Stack > > To: user@hbase.apache.org; Eric Burin des Roziers > > Sent: Friday, May 6, 2011 4:37 PM > > Subject: Re: put to WAL and scan/get operation concurrency > > > > On Fri, May 6, 20

Re: put to WAL and scan/get operation concurrency

2011-05-06 Thread Jean-Daniel Cryans
t it get an exception, right? > Thanks, > -Eric > > > > > From: Stack > To: user@hbase.apache.org; Eric Burin des Roziers > Sent: Friday, May 6, 2011 4:37 PM > Subject: Re: put to WAL and scan/get operation concurrency > > On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 1:45 AM, Eric Buri

Re: put to WAL and scan/get operation concurrency

2011-05-06 Thread Eric Burin des Roziers
exception, right? Thanks, -Eric From: Stack To: user@hbase.apache.org; Eric Burin des Roziers Sent: Friday, May 6, 2011 4:37 PM Subject: Re: put to WAL and scan/get operation concurrency On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 1:45 AM, Eric Burin des Roziers wrote: > Tha

Re: put to WAL and scan/get operation concurrency

2011-05-06 Thread Stack
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 1:45 AM, Eric Burin des Roziers wrote: > Thanks Stack,  I hadn't read the percolator paper (doing it now).  I think I > am not describing my question properly.  Basically, based on the hbase-trx > implementation, when the transaction commits, there is a time window where a

Re: put to WAL and scan/get operation concurrency

2011-05-06 Thread Eric Burin des Roziers
Burin des Roziers Sent: Thursday, May 5, 2011 10:05 PM Subject: Re: put to WAL and scan/get operation concurrency On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 11:43 AM, Eric Burin des Roziers wrote: > Hi Jean-Daniel, > > Yes, I need to have a multi-row transactional aware HBase for the types of > processing

Re: put to WAL and scan/get operation concurrency

2011-05-05 Thread Stack
On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 11:43 AM, Eric Burin des Roziers wrote: > Hi Jean-Daniel, > > Yes, I need to have a multi-row transactional aware HBase for the types of > processing I need to do.  I need to avoid having partial rows available and I > am in the process of selecting a way to implement such

Re: put to WAL and scan/get operation concurrency

2011-05-05 Thread Eric Burin des Roziers
, 2011 7:24 PM Subject: Re: put to WAL and scan/get operation concurrency Inline. On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 6:03 AM, Eric Burin des Roziers wrote: > Hi, > > I am currently looking at adding a transactional consistency aspect to HBase > and had 2 questions: > > 1. My understandin

Re: put to WAL and scan/get operation concurrency

2011-05-05 Thread Jean-Daniel Cryans
Inline. On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 6:03 AM, Eric Burin des Roziers wrote: > Hi, > > I am currently looking at adding a transactional consistency aspect to HBase > and had 2 questions: > > 1. My understanding is that when the client performs an operation (put, > delete, incr), it is sent to the regi

put to WAL and scan/get operation concurrency

2011-05-05 Thread Eric Burin des Roziers
Hi, I am currently looking at adding a transactional consistency aspect to HBase and had 2 questions: 1. My understanding is that when the client performs an operation (put, delete, incr), it is sent to the region server which delegates it to different region servers, which in turn puts it in