;> From: Ted Yu
>> To: user@hbase.apache.org
>> Sent: Thursday, July 5, 2012 11:28 AM
>> Subject: Re: Mixing Puts and Deletes in a single RPC
>>
>> Take a look at HBASE-3584: Allow atomic put/delete in one call
>> It is in 0.94, meaning it is not even in cdh4
&g
ut I has assumed CDH4 would include
> HBase 0.94.
>
> -- Lars
>
>
>
>
> From: Ted Yu
> To: user@hbase.apache.org
> Sent: Thursday, July 5, 2012 11:28 AM
> Subject: Re: Mixing Puts and Deletes in a single RPC
>
> Take a look at HBASE
Well then, I guess if you really want to save space...
Take your DAO... add a method that takes the fields and writes them to JSON
string and converts it to a byte Array. (AVRO?)
If your field is null, you just don't add it to the output string.
That would take care of all of your overhead is
Hi Michael,
Thank you for your reply.
I will answer your questions one by one.
---I have to ask... why are you deleting anything from your columns?
In the event that there is a null value in a source system, we have to
reflect that somehow and assume that there could be a value in HBase and
th
I was going to post this yesterday, but real work got in the way...
I have to ask... why are you deleting anything from your columns?
The reason I ask is that you're sync'ing an object from an RDBMS to HBase.
While HBase allows fields that contain NULL not to exist, your RDBMS doesn't.
Your c
>
> -- Lars
>
>
>
>
> From: Ted Yu
> To: user@hbase.apache.org
> Sent: Thursday, July 5, 2012 11:28 AM
> Subject: Re: Mixing Puts and Deletes in a single RPC
>
> Take a look at HBASE-3584: Allow atomic put/delete in one call
> It is in 0.94, me
I'll let the Cloudera folks speak, but I has assumed CDH4 would include HBase
0.94.
-- Lars
From: Ted Yu
To: user@hbase.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, July 5, 2012 11:28 AM
Subject: Re: Mixing Puts and Deletes in a single RPC
Take a look at HBASE-3584:
Thanks for the info Ted,
Anyone tackled this problem before 0.94?
Keith
On 7/5/12 2:28 PM, "Ted Yu" wrote:
>Take a look at HBASE-3584: Allow atomic put/delete in one call
>It is in 0.94, meaning it is not even in cdh4
>
>Cheers
>
>On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 11:19 AM, Keith Wyss
>wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>
Take a look at HBASE-3584: Allow atomic put/delete in one call
It is in 0.94, meaning it is not even in cdh4
Cheers
On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 11:19 AM, Keith Wyss wrote:
> Hi,
>
> My organization has been doing something zany to simulate atomic row
> operations is HBase.
>
> We have a converter-ob
Hi,
My organization has been doing something zany to simulate atomic row operations
is HBase.
We have a converter-object model for the writables that are populated in an
HBase table, and one of the governing assumptions
is that if you are dealing with an Object record, you read all the columns
10 matches
Mail list logo