Hello HBase Users,
I wanted to let you know that a new release 1.0.0 of the Trafodion project is
now available for download at http://downloads.trafodion.org/. This is a major
release, including substantial improvements designed to make Trafodion the
Enterprise-class Transactional SQL Engine fo
I am sorry fat-fingers..
Artem Ervits
On Jan 29, 2015 8:40 PM, "Artem Ervits" wrote:
> Artem Ervits
> On Jan 28, 2015 1:12 PM, "kennyut" wrote:
>
>> In the /var/log/hbase folder, I can find two files:
>> 1. hbase-cmf-hbase-HBASERESTSERVER-ip-172-x-x-x.ec2.internal.log.out
>> 2. hbase-cmf-hbase-
Artem Ervits
On Jan 28, 2015 1:12 PM, "kennyut" wrote:
> In the /var/log/hbase folder, I can find two files:
> 1. hbase-cmf-hbase-HBASERESTSERVER-ip-172-x-x-x.ec2.internal.log.out
> 2. hbase-cmf-hbase-MASTER-ip-172-x-x-x.ec2.internal.log.out
>
> The '1' file was updated several days before, so it
There's an option when you execute yscb to say how many clients
threads you want to use. I tried with 1/8/16/32. Those results are
with 16, the improvement 1vs8 it's pretty high not as much 16 to 32.
I only use one yscb, could it be that important?
-threads : the number of client threads. By defau
How many instances of ycsb do you run and how many threads do you use per
instance.I guess these ops are per instance and you should get similar
numbers if you run more instances.In short try running more workload
instances...
-Nishanth
On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 8:49 AM, Guillermo Ortiz
wrote:
Yes, I'm using 40%. i can't access to those data either.
I don't know how YSCB executes the reads and if they are random and
could take advange of the cache.
Do you think that it's an acceptable performance?
2015-01-29 16:26 GMT+01:00 Ted Yu :
> What's the value for hfile.block.cache.size ?
>
>
What's the value for hfile.block.cache.size ?
By default it is 40%. You may want to increase its value if you're using
default.
Andrew published some ycsb results :
http://people.apache.org/~apurtell/results-ycsb-0.98.8/ycsb
-0.98.0-vs-0.98.8.pdf
However, I couldn't access the above now.
Cheers
Is there any result with that benchmark to compare??
I'm executing the different workloads and for example for 100% Reads
in a table with 10Millions of records I only get an performance of
2000operations/sec. I hoped much better performance but I could be
wrong. I'd like to know if it's a normal pe
