Do you receive the mail such as 'confirm subscribe user@hbase.apache.org' ?
On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 9:24 AM, Cheney Sun wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have sent several subscribe messages to the address(
> user-subscr...@hbase.apache.org), but no any response. Is the mail list
> closed for subscription?
>
Thanks Kamil. I was trying Phoenix 3.0 against Hbase 0.96. I don't think that
combination works. Because of endpoint coprocessor implementation /apis changed
a lot from 0.94 to 0.96.
I tried Phoenix 4.0 on 0.98.0. But it thrown below exception. I will try to run
on Hbase 0.98.1+ and update stat
I do accept responsibility that the release vote was not well timed with
HBaseCon in the mix, and then the Apache email outage. The decision to
resign is still the right one for messing up.
On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 10:54 AM, Andrew Purtell
wrote:
> Actually I do resign as RM for 0.98 effective im
I saw your message.
There was ASF email outage.
See https://twitter.com/infrabot
On Sun, May 11, 2014 at 6:24 PM, Cheney Sun wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have sent several subscribe messages to the address(
> user-subscr...@hbase.apache.org), but no any response. Is the mail list
> closed for subscript
Hi Gaurav,
Please check my last reply.
Please don't send multiple emails for the same issue.
Sent from my iPhone
> On May 8, 2014, at 4:52 AM, Gaurav Thakur wrote:
>
> Hi I have a secure java client which fails to connect to hbase.
>
> Using the same keytab and principal I`m able to use hbas
Actually I do resign as RM for 0.98 effective immediately.
I've not seen the community before disinterested in a release sufficiently that
not even simple package verification is time worth spending.
> On May 12, 2014, at 10:47 AM, Andrew Purtell wrote:
>
> Too late I already put out the arti
Too late I already put out the artifacts. I thought the release vote is lazy
consensus. If you would like me to resign as RM for 0.98 I will.
> On May 12, 2014, at 9:17 AM, Todd Lipcon wrote:
>
> Hey Andrew,
>
> Sorry for the late email here, but -- I believe releases need at least
> three +1
Hey Andrew,
Sorry for the late email here, but -- I believe releases need at least
three +1 votes from PMC members[1]. Perhaps people were a bit busy last
week due to HBaseCon and we should extend the voting on this release
candidate for another week?
[1] http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.h
thanks. I will try this.
by the way, byte range is -128 - 127
On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 6:13 AM, Michael Segel
wrote:
> Simple answer… you really can’t.
> The best thing you can do is to pre split the table in to 4 regions based on
> splitting the first byte in to 4 equal ranges. (0-63,64-127,128-
looks similar to this
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/11649824/hbase-error-not-a-hostport-pair
possibly jar version mismatch between hbase client and server
On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 2:49 AM, Bogala, Chandra Reddy wrote:
> Hi,
>I am trying to setup Phoenix and test queries on Hbase. But g
Chandra,
try copying the the phoenix-core jars into hbase/lib folder instead of
loading from hbase-site.xml and notice the phoenix versions supported
against hbase versions here:
http://phoenix.incubator.apache.org/building.html
i.e. "Phoenix 3.0 is running against hbase0.94+, Phoenix 4.0 is runn
Simple answer… you really can’t.
The best thing you can do is to pre split the table in to 4 regions based on
splitting the first byte in to 4 equal ranges. (0-63,64-127,128-191,191-255)
And hope that you’ll have an even split.
In theory, over time you will.
On May 8, 2014, at 1:58 PM, Li
On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 12:37 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
> BIGTOP-1302
Ouch. See the comment I left on that issue. I could look into that for you
if you are amenable.
--
Best regards,
- Andy
Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
(via Tom White)
Sorry...wrong mailing list..
On Sun, May 11, 2014 at 7:49 PM, chandra kant <
chandralakshmikan...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Some of my blocks are under replicated. Can anybody tell me at what speed
> namenode replicates it so that dfs.replication factor is satisfied and
> blocks become normal
I have hit a couple of issue within Bigtop and now need to pull it back over
the event horizon ;) In particular BIGTOP-1302
I hope to have it done and then tested by the end of tomorrow. Thanks
Cos
On Tue, May 06, 2014 at 07:04PM, Andrew Purtell wrote:
> +1
>
> Unit test suite passes 100% 25
Hey Gaurav,
You need to have keytab and principal. Additionally, the configuration
files of cluster should be present in classpath of your app.
Please find below the sample code to create a configuration object for a
secure cluster:
/**
* @param keytab location of the keytab file
* @param
Hi,
Some of my blocks are under replicated. Can anybody tell me at what speed
namenode replicates it so that dfs.replication factor is satisfied and
blocks become normal again? Or does it solely depend upon load factor on
namenode and it can't be measured accurately?
thanx
Chandra
Please see http://hbase.apache.org/book.html#rowkey.regionsplits
On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 5:58 AM, Li Li wrote:
> say I have 4 region server. How to pre split a table using MD5 as row key?
>
say I have 4 region server. How to pre split a table using MD5 as row key?
What GC parameters did you specify for JVM ?
Thanks
On May 7, 2014, at 6:27 PM, "sunweiwei" wrote:
> I find lots of these in gc.log. It seems like CMS gc run many times but old
> Generation is always large.
> I'm confused.
> Any suggestion will be appreciated. Thanks.
>
> 2014-04-29T13:40
Evidently my vote email didn't go through, perhaps because of the email outage
in the last 3-4 days my vote.
For what it worth - +1 from me.
Thanks Andrew!
Cos
On Fri, May 09, 2014 at 08:14AM, Andrew Purtell wrote:
> With one +1 and no 0 or -1 votes, this vote has passed. I have sent the
> arti
21 matches
Mail list logo
