Re: one-to-many interceptor

2014-06-24 Thread Mike Percy
Matt, no prob! Mike Sent from my iPhone > On Jun 24, 2014, at 8:35 PM, Matt Tenenbaum > wrote: > > Thanks Mike. That's very helpful. > > It should be no trouble to establish an upper bound on the intra-event > packing, so I should be able to tune the capacity parameters in the way you > su

Re: one-to-many interceptor

2014-06-24 Thread Matt Tenenbaum
Thanks Mike. That's very helpful. It should be no trouble to establish an upper bound on the intra-event packing, so I should be able to tune the capacity parameters in the way you suggest. Besides, aren't the sharp edges what make it fun to play with? I may be able to impose suitable restriction

Re: one-to-many interceptor

2014-06-24 Thread Mike Percy
Hi Matt, If you can guarantee there are a certain # of events in a single "wrapper" event, or bound the limit, then you could potentially get away with this. However if you're not careful you could get stuck in an infinite fail-backoff-retry loop due to exceeding the (configurable) channel transact