Hi,
Some of my colleagues are using Flink 1.17.1 server but with projects with
Flink 1.8 libraries, so far the projects are working fine without issue for
a month now.
Will there be any issue that we are not just aware of, if we continue with
this kind of set up env? Appreciate any response.
Re
Hi Flink Community,
we are waiting for the next release of the Flink Kubernetes Operator, because
we are experiencing problems with loosing the HA metadata similar to
FLINK-33011 [0].
Since the problem is already fixed and also backported to the 1.6 branch [1],
my question would be whether we c
Hi Patricia,
There's no guarantee of compatibility between different Flink minor
versions and it's not supported. If it works, that can be specific to
this use case and could break at any time. It's up to you to determine
if that is sufficient for you or not.
Best regards,
Martijn
On Mon, Oct 1
Hi Kirti Dhar,
There isn't really enough information to answer it: are you using
Flink in bounded mode, how have you created your job, what is
appearing in the logs etc.
Best regards,
Martijn
On Mon, Oct 16, 2023 at 7:01 AM Kirti Dhar Upadhyay K via user
wrote:
>
> Hi Community,
>
>
>
> Can so
Hi Ankur,
This is used during CI runs, but it's not bundled/distributed with
Flink itself.
Best regards,
Martijn
On Thu, Oct 12, 2023 at 12:09 PM Singhal, Ankur wrote:
>
> Hi Matijn,
>
> This is just a reference but we are using it at multiple places.
> https://github.com/apache/flink/blob/mas
Hi Niklas!
We weren't planning a 1.6.1 release and instead we were focusing on
wrapping up changes for the 1.7.0 release coming in a month or so.
However if there is enough interest and we have some committers/PMC willing
to help with the release we can always do 1.6.1 but I personally don't have
