Hi,
I think there are a couple of potential explanations for the increased latency.
Let me point out two of the most obvious that come to my mind:
1) A state size of 20 MB sounds like something that could (completely or to a
large extend) fit into some cache layer of a modern CPU, whereas 200 M
From: Biplob Biswas [mailto:revolutioni...@gmail.com]
Sent: יום ב 30 אוקטובר 2017 11:02
To: Sofer, Tovi [ICG-IT]
Cc: Narendra Joshi ; user
Subject: Re: state size effects latency
Hi Tovi,
This might seem a really naive question (and its neither a solution or answer
to your question ) but I am
; *Sent:* יום א 29 אוקטובר 2017 12:13
> *To:* Sofer, Tovi [ICG-IT]
> *Cc:* user
> *Subject:* Re: state size effects latency
>
>
>
> We have also faced similar issues. The only thing that happens in sync
> when using async snaphots is getting a persistent point in time
: Re: state size effects latency
We have also faced similar issues. The only thing that happens in sync when
using async snaphots is getting a persistent point in time picture which in
case of rocksdb backend is making symlinks. That would linearly increase with
number of files to symlink but
We have also faced similar issues. The only thing that happens in sync when
using async snaphots is getting a persistent point in time picture which in
case of rocksdb backend is making symlinks. That would linearly increase
with number of files to symlink but this should be negligible. We could no
Hi all,
In our application we have a requirement to very low latency, preferably less
than 5ms.
We were able to achieve this so far, but when we start increasing the state
size, we see distinctive decrease in latency.
We have added MinPauseBetweenCheckpoints, and are using async snapshots.
*
