ing jobs can affect each
other because they are running in the same process. So for example, this
can have security implications.
>
>
> Thanks a lot again,
>
> Claudia
>
>
>
>
>
> *Von:* Till Rohrmann [mailto:trohrm...@apache.org]
> *Gesendet:* Dienstag, 2. August
wouldn’t need to manage more than one cluster setup but could only run one job
at a time?
Thanks a lot again,
Claudia
Von: Till Rohrmann [mailto:trohrm...@apache.org]
Gesendet: Dienstag, 2. August 2016 16:27
An: user@flink.apache.org
Betreff: Re: partial savepoints/combining savepoints
Hi Claudia,
1
> this service and deploy itself as the Flink job with a dedicated entry
> point. Is this a good idea? Or is it even possible?
>
>
>
> Thanks in advance,
>
> Claudia
>
>
>
> *Von:* Till Rohrmann [mailto:trohrm...@apache.org]
> *Gesendet:* Montag, 1. Augus
dedicated entry point. Is this a good idea? Or
is it even possible?
Thanks in advance,
Claudia
Von: Till Rohrmann [mailto:trohrm...@apache.org]
Gesendet: Montag, 1. August 2016 16:21
An: user@flink.apache.org
Betreff: Re: partial savepoints/combining savepoints
Hi Claudia,
unfortunately neither
Hi Claudia,
unfortunately neither taking partial savepoints nor combining multiple
savepoints into one savepoint is currently supported by Flink.
However, we're currently working on dynamic scaling which will allow to
adjust the parallelism of your Flink job. This helps you to scale in/out
depend
Hey everyone,
I've got some questions regarding savepoints in Flink. I have the following
situation:
There is a microservice that reads data from Kafka topics, creates Flink
streams from this data and does different computations/pattern matching
workloads. If the overall workload for this serv
