Re: Using RocksDBStateBackend and SSD to store states, application runs slower..

2022-07-21 Thread Teoh, Hong
RE: [EXTERNAL]Using RocksDBStateBackend and SSD to store states, application runs slower.. CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you can confirm the sender and know the content is safe. Hi, using FLASH_SSD_OPTIMIZED alr

Re: Using RocksDBStateBackend and SSD to store states, application runs slower..

2022-07-21 Thread Jing Ge
Hi, using FLASH_SSD_OPTIMIZED already sets the number of threads to 4. This optimization can improve the source throughput and reduce the delayed wrate rate. If this optimization didn't fix the back pressure, could you share more information about your job? Could you check the metric of the back

Re: Using RocksDBStateBackend and SSD to store states, application runs slower..

2022-07-21 Thread Yaroslav Tkachenko
Hi! I'd try re-running the SSD test with the following config options: state.backend.rocksdb.thread.num: 4 state.backend.rocksdb.predefined-options: FLASH_SSD_OPTIMIZED On Thu, Jul 21, 2022 at 4:11 AM vtygoss wrote: > Hi, community! > > > I am doing some performance tests based on my scene. >

Using RocksDBStateBackend and SSD to store states, application runs slower..

2022-07-21 Thread vtygoss
Hi, community! I am doing some performance tests based on my scene. 1. Environment - Flink: 1.13.5 - StateBackend: RocksDB, incremental - user case: complex sql contains 7 joins and 2 aggregation, input data 30,000,000 records and output 60,000,000 records about 80GB. - resource: flink on ya