Re: Understanding connected streams use without timestamps

2016-11-21 Thread Aljoscha Krettek
Nope, not right now but this is pretty much what we're trying to solve with side inputs: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1hIgxi2Zchww_5fWUHLoYiXwSBXjv-M5eOv-MKQYN3m4/edit On Mon, 21 Nov 2016 at 16:11 Theodore Vasiloudis < theodoros.vasilou...@gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks for the clarification Gy

Re: Understanding connected streams use without timestamps

2016-11-21 Thread Theodore Vasiloudis
Thanks for the clarification Gyula! In that case, is it possible currently to make one of the two connected streams stall until the other stream has produced at least one output before it starts producing as well? On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 3:16 PM, Gyula Fóra wrote: > Hi :) > > The execution of

Re: Understanding connected streams use without timestamps

2016-11-21 Thread Gyula Fóra
Hi :) The execution of the Connected functions (map1/map2 in this case) are not affected by the timestamps. In other words it is pretty much arbitrary which input arrives at the CoMapFunction first. So I think you did everything correctly. Gyula Theodore Vasiloudis ezt írta (időpont: 2016. nov

Understanding connected streams use without timestamps

2016-11-21 Thread Theodore Vasiloudis
Hello all, I was playing around with the the IncrementalLearningSkeleton example and I had a couple of questions regarding the behavior of connected streams. In the example the elements are assigned timestamps, and there is a stream, model, that produces Double[] elements by ingesting and process