On Mon, Oct 25, 2021 at 05:19:32PM +0800, JING ZHANG wrote:
> Hi,
> > We wonder if this is expected behavior or not?
> I think it's expected. You could find more information in document [1].
> Checkpoints and Savepoints differ in their implementation. Checkpoints are
> designed to be lightweight an
Hi,
> We wonder if this is expected behavior or not?
I think it's expected. You could find more information in document [1].
Checkpoints and Savepoints differ in their implementation. Checkpoints are
designed to be lightweight and fast. They might (but don’t necessarily have
to) make use of differe
Hi ChangZhuo,
Yes, restoring from a savepoint is expected to be significantly slower
from a checkpoint.
Regards,
Roman
On Mon, Oct 25, 2021 at 9:45 AM ChangZhuo Chen (陳昌倬) wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> We found that our application savepoint restoration time (~ 40 mins) is
> much slower than checkpoint re
Hi,
We found that our application savepoint restoration time (~ 40 mins) is
much slower than checkpoint restoration time (~ 4 mins). We wonder if
this is expected behavior or not?
Some detail about the environment:
* Flink version: 1.14.0
* Persistent storage is GCS, via the following jars:
