Re: Support for gRPC in Flink StateFun 2.x

;user@flink.apache.org" Subject: Re: Support for gRPC in Flink StateFun 2.x Hi Dalmo, Thanks a lot for sharing this use case! If I understand the requirement correctly, you are mostly concerned with performance. In that case I've created an issue [1] to add a gRPC transport for StateFun, a

Re: Support for gRPC in Flink StateFun 2.x

f the use case. Happy to talk > further and answer more questions. > > > > Best, > > > > Dalmo > > > > > > > > *From: *Igal Shilman > *Date: *Saturday, September 19, 2020 at 01:41 > *To: *Dalmo Cirne > *Cc: *"user@flink.apache.org&quo

Re: Support for gRPC in Flink StateFun 2.x

case. Happy to talk further and answer more questions. Best, Dalmo From: Igal Shilman Date: Saturday, September 19, 2020 at 01:41 To: Dalmo Cirne Cc: "user@flink.apache.org" Subject: Re: Support for gRPC in Flink StateFun 2.x Hi, Your observation is correct, currently the o

Re: Support for gRPC in Flink StateFun 2.x

Hi, Your observation is correct, currently the only way to invoke a remote function is trough an HTTP POST request to a service that exposes a StateFun endpoint. The endpoint must implement the client side of a the “RequestReply” protocol as defined by StateFun (basically an invocation contains t

Support for gRPC in Flink StateFun 2.x

Hi, In the latest Flink Forward, from April 2020, there were mentions that adding support to gRPC, in addition to HTTP, was in the works and would be implemented in the future. Looking into the flink-statefun repository on GitHub, one can see that ther