che.org/projects/flink/flink-docs-stable/ops/state/checkpoints.html#resuming-from-a-retained-checkpoint
>>
>> Best
>> Yun Tang
>> --
>> *From:* Rex Fenley
>> *Sent:* Tuesday, January 12, 2021 11:01
>> *To:* user
>> *Cc:* Brad
, January 12, 2021 11:01
> *To:* user
> *Cc:* Brad Davis
> *Subject:* Restoring from checkpoint with different parallism
>
> Hello,
>
> When using the TableAPI, is it safe to run a flink job with a different
> `-p` parallelism while restoring from a checkpoint (not a savepoint)
From: Rex Fenley
Sent: Tuesday, January 12, 2021 11:01
To: user
Cc: Brad Davis
Subject: Restoring from checkpoint with different parallism
Hello,
When using the TableAPI, is it safe to run a flink job with a different `-p`
parallelism while restoring from a checkpoint (not a
Hello,
When using the TableAPI, is it safe to run a flink job with a different
`-p` parallelism while restoring from a checkpoint (not a savepoint) using
`-s`, without any rescaling of actual machines? I don't seem to find this
documented anywhere.
Thanks!
--
Rex Fenley | Software Engineer -
