+1 for including in the next RC.
> On 4. Dec 2017, at 13:10, Gyula Fóra wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I think what we need to ask here is whether the custom workaround solutions
> people are using over the place are any more robust than our own
> implementation.
>
> I would be in favor of including it
Hi,
I think what we need to ask here is whether the custom workaround solutions
people are using over the place are any more robust than our own
implementation.
I would be in favor of including it if the PR is merged in time for the
next RC.
Gyula
Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai ezt írta (időpont: 2017. d
Hi,
I’ve created a PR to publicly expose the feature:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/5117.
Whether or not we should include this in the next release candidate for 1.4 is
still up for discussion.
Best,
Gordon
On 4 December 2017 at 3:02:29 PM, Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai (tzuli...@apache.org)
wrot
Hi Soheil,
That feature is actually already internally available.
The only issue is that the functionality is not yet exposed via any public APIs
on the Kafka consumer.
Please see this JIRA here: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-8190.
I’m not sure of exposing the pattern-based subscri
