Great! I was just thinking that, in principle, a streaming sink is an
extension of a batch one. Am I wrong?
This would avoid a lot of code duplication and would improve the overall
maintainability..
On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 4:35 AM, wyphao.2007 wrote:
> Hi Flavio, I made a PR for this : https://g
Just one note: I took a look at your connector and it doesn't provide any
failure handling mechanism that is very useful for us.
Maybe it could worth to add ActionRequestFailureHandler as provided now by
the current ES streaming connector and introduced by commit
https://github.com/apache/flink/com
