; recieved 'a', I think the NFA might have two possible transitions, one is
>> to accept 'b'
>> and get a match, another one is to ignore 'b' and waiting for the
>> following events, thus
>> the condition might be eval for two times.
>
il --
> *Sender:*Schwalbe Matthias <mailto:matthias.schwa...@viseca.ch>>
> *Send Date:*Wed Oct 27 17:55:18 2021
> *Recipients:*Puneet Duggal <mailto:puneetduggal1...@gmail.com>>, user
> mailto:user@fli
ting for the
> following events, thus
> the condition might be eval for two times.
>
> Best,
> Yun
>
>
> --Original Mail --
> *Sender:*Schwalbe Matthias
> *Send Date:*Wed Oct 27 17:55:18 2021
> *Recipients:*Puneet Duggal , user <
> user@flink.apache.o
Hi Puneet,
Sorry I'm not be an expert for CEP, but the underlying implementation of the
CEP should
be based on the NFA, and from the API documentation, `followedBy` does not
require the
two patterns are adjacent (namely the give pattern also accepts ['a', 'c',
'b']. Thus when
recieved 'a', I th
Hi Puneet,
… not able to answer your question, but I would be curious to also print out
the value with your diagnostic message.
… assuming we’ll see an ‘a’ and a ‘b’ for both filters resp.
… simple explanation would be that the filters are applied to all input,
regardless of the pattern matchi
