Re: Most convenient data structure for unspecified length objects

2015-03-16 Thread Vinh June
-archive.2336050.n4.nabble.com/Most-convenient-data-structure-for-unspecified-length-objects-tp859p863.html Sent from the Apache Flink (Incubator) User Mailing List archive. mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Most convenient data structure for unspecified length objects

2015-03-16 Thread Stephan Ewen
; -- > View this message in context: > http://apache-flink-incubator-user-mailing-list-archive.2336050.n4.nabble.com/Most-convenient-data-structure-for-unspecified-length-objects-tp859p861.html > Sent from the Apache Flink (Incubator) User Mailing List archive. mailing > list archive at Nabble.com. >

Re: Most convenient data structure for unspecified length objects

2015-03-16 Thread pietro
-structure-for-unspecified-length-objects-tp859p861.html Sent from the Apache Flink (Incubator) User Mailing List archive. mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Most convenient data structure for unspecified length objects

2015-03-16 Thread Stephan Ewen
gt; Array[String] )/ > > where the three arrays store the optional fields. > > It worked, but is it a good way to do that? > Can I do it better? > > Many thanks, > regards. > > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://apache-flink-incubat

Most convenient data structure for unspecified length objects

2015-03-16 Thread pietro
-incubator-user-mailing-list-archive.2336050.n4.nabble.com/Most-convenient-data-structure-for-unspecified-length-objects-tp859.html Sent from the Apache Flink (Incubator) User Mailing List archive. mailing list archive at Nabble.com.