Hi Moiz,
Then it should work.
And the previous issue is already fixed on the master.
Kostas
> On May 4, 2017, at 6:02 PM, Moiz Jinia wrote:
>
> It'll definitely have a where clause. Just forgot to include it in the
> example. Just meant to focus on the within clause.
>
> Am on 1.3 - expect i
It'll definitely have a where clause. Just forgot to include it in the example.
Just meant to focus on the within clause.
Am on 1.3 - expect it'll be fixed by the time stable is out?
Thanks!
Moiz
—
sent from phone
On 04-May-2017, at 8:12 PM, Kostas Kloudas wrote:
Hi Moiz,
You are on Flink
Hi Moiz,
You are on Flink 1.2 or 1.3?
In Flink 1.2 (latest stable) there are no known issues, so this will work
correctly.
Keep in mind that without any conditions (where-clauses), you will only get all
possible
2-tuples of incoming elements, which could also be done with a simple process
fu
Does Flink (with a persistent State backend such as RocksDB) work well with
long running Patterns of this type? (running into days)
Pattern.begin("start").followedBy("end").within(Time.days(3))
Is there some gotchas here or things to watch out for?
Thanks,
Moiz
