Yes, this is also a good idea if you don't ask for this stream to be empty
from the source.
Best,
Dmitry
Dmitry Minaev 于2019年10月25日周五 下午12:21写道：
> Thanks, I'll check it out.
> Actually I realized I can always put a filter operator that'll effectively
> remove everything from the stream.
>
> --
Thanks, I'll check it out.
Actually I realized I can always put a filter operator that'll effectively
remove everything from the stream.
-- Dmitry
On Thu, Oct 24, 2019 at 2:29 AM vino yang wrote:
> Hi Dmitry,
>
> Perhaps an easy way is to customize a source function. Then in the run
> method, s
Hi Dmitry,
Perhaps an easy way is to customize a source function. Then in the run
method, start an empty loop? But I don't understand the meaning of starting
a stream pipeline without generating data.
Best,
Vino
Dmitry Minaev 于2019年10月24日周四 上午6:16写道：
> Hi everyone,
>
> I have a pipeline where
Hi everyone,
I have a pipeline where I union several streams. I want to test it and don't
want to populate one of the streams. I'm usually creating streams with:
DataStreamTestBase.createTestStreamWith(event).close();
The above statement creates a stream and puts the `event` inside. But in my
ca
