; View this message in context: http://apache-flink-user-
> mailing-list-archive.2336050.n4.nabble.com/FlinkCEP-latency-throughput-
> tp13170p13221.html
> Sent from the Apache Flink User Mailing List archive. mailing list archive
> at Nabble.com.
>
answer is yes, the first element in
the matching pattern will wait inevitably longer than the last one
Thank you for your time!!!
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-flink-user-mailing-list-archive.2336050.n4.nabble.com/FlinkCEP-latency-throughput-tp13170p13221.html
Sent from the
On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 10:34 AM, Kostas Kloudas <
k.klou...@data-artisans.com> wrote:
> Hello Alfred,
>
> As a first general remark, Flink was not optimized for multicore
> deployments
> but rather for distributed environments. This implies overheads
> (serialization,
> communication etc), when c
Hello Alfred,
As a first general remark, Flink was not optimized for multicore deployments
but rather for distributed environments. This implies overheads (serialization,
communication etc), when compared to libs optimized for multicores. So there
may be libraries that are better optimized for t
of the dataset by the
time taken to complete the experiment.
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-flink-user-mailing-list-archive.2336050.n4.nabble.com/FlinkCEP-latency-throughput-tp13170.html
Sent from the Apache Flink User Mailing List archive. mailing list archive at
Nabble.com.
