I recall looking for these once in the SQL standard spec, AFAIR they are
not part of it.
On Fri, Nov 12, 2021, 11:48 Francesco Guardiani
wrote:
> Yep I agree with waiting for calcite to support it. As a temporary
> workaround you can define your own udfs with that functionality.
>
> I also wonde
Yep I agree with waiting for calcite to support it. As a temporary
workaround you can define your own udfs with that functionality.
I also wonder, are the bitwise operators defined in the ansi sql
specification? Or should we just follow the common sense behavior of
databases supporting it?
On Fri
Sure, I can take a try. Before starting the work, we should discuss the api
of bit operation function. There are two alternatives
1. add some built in functions include bitAnd,bitNot,bitOr,bitXor
2. support &, |, ^, ~ operators in calcite first. Currently, there is a
relative jira https://issues.a
Hi,
I don't think there's currently anyone in the community who is working on
the bit operation functions. Would you be interested and able to make a
contribution on that?
Best regards,
Martijn
On Thu, 11 Nov 2021 at 03:54, JIN FENG wrote:
> hi all,
> I met two problems when I use FlinkSQL.
>
hi all,
I met two problems when I use FlinkSQL.
1. Is there any plan to support bit operation functions ? Currently
there is some jira mentioned about this,
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-14990 ,
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-12451 But It seems that it
hasn't been u
