Thanks Chesnay, so if I read it well it shouldn't be too long (at least
less time than between regular 1.x releases).
On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 4:24 PM, Chesnay Schepler
wrote:
> As of right now there is no specific date, see also
> https://flink.apache.org/news/2017/11/22/release-1.4-and-1.5-time
As of right now there is no specific date, see also
https://flink.apache.org/news/2017/11/22/release-1.4-and-1.5-timeline.html.
On 29.01.2018 13:41, Christophe Jolif wrote:
Thanks a lot. Is there any timeline for 1.5 by the way?
--
Christophe
On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 11:36 AM, Tzu-Li (Gordon)
Thanks a lot. Is there any timeline for 1.5 by the way?
--
Christophe
On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 11:36 AM, Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai
wrote:
> Hi Christophe,
>
> Thanks a lot for the contribution! I’ll add reviewing the PR to my backlog.
> I would like / will try to take a look at the PR by the end of th
Hi Christophe,
Thanks a lot for the contribution! I’ll add reviewing the PR to my backlog.
I would like / will try to take a look at the PR by the end of this week, after
some 1.4.1 blockers which I’m still busy with.
Cheers,
Gordon
On 29 January 2018 at 9:25:27 AM, Fabian Hueske (fhue...@gmail
Hi Christophe,
great! Thanks for your contribution.
I'm quite busy right now, but I agree that we should have support for ES
5.3 and Es 6.x for the next minor release 1.5.
Best,
Fabian
2018-01-26 23:09 GMT+01:00 Christophe Jolif :
> Ok, I got it "done". I have a PR for ES5.3 (FLINK-7386) just
Ok, I got it "done". I have a PR for ES5.3 (FLINK-7386) just rebasing the
original one that was never merged (#4675). And added ES 6.X through
RestHighLevelClient on top (FLINK-8101). This is:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/5374. And believe it or not but
someone else submitted a PR for thos
Great, thank you!
Hopefully, this pushes the PR forward.
Thanks, Fabian
2018-01-25 22:30 GMT+01:00 Christophe Jolif :
> Hi Fabian,
>
> FYI I rebased the branch and tested it and it worked OK on a sample.
>
> --
> Christophe
>
> On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 2:53 PM, Fabian Hueske wrote:
>
>> Hi Adria
Hi Fabian,
FYI I rebased the branch and tested it and it worked OK on a sample.
--
Christophe
On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 2:53 PM, Fabian Hueske wrote:
> Hi Adrian,
>
> thanks for raising this issue again.
> I agree, we should add support for newer ES versions.
> I've added 1.5.0 as target release
OK, thanks a lot Fabian.
Adrian
- Original message -From: Fabian Hueske To: Adrian Vasiliu Cc: user Subject: Re: ElasticsearchSink in Flink 1.4.0 with Elasticsearch 5.2+Date: Mon, Jan 22, 2018 2:54 PM
Hi Adrian, thanks for raising this issue again.I agree, we should add support for
Hi Adrian,
thanks for raising this issue again.
I agree, we should add support for newer ES versions.
I've added 1.5.0 as target release for FLINK-7386 and bumped the priority
up.
In the meantime, you can try Flavio's approach (he responded to the mail
thread you linked) and fork and fix the conn
Hello,
With a local run of Flink 1.4.0, ElasticsearchSink fails for me with a local run of Elasticsearch 5.6.4 and 5.2.1, while the same code (with adjusted versions of dependencies) works fine with Elasticsearch 2.x (tried 2.4.6).
I get:java.lang.NoSuchMethodError: org.elasticsearch.action.bulk.
11 matches
Mail list logo