Tony,
You are right; I hadn't thought this through. The KeyedStateFunction only
has access to one piece of state at a time, which is the state for some
specific key associated with one specific state descriptor. You can fetch,
update, or clear that piece of state, but as far as I know, you can't
o
Hi David,
I have read the document for `Context.applyToKeyedState()`, but I still
have some questions for using it to implement keyed state migration.
`Context.applyToKeyedState()` can only be called in
`processBoradcaseElement()`, so it won't have any key information.
It looks like I can use `Key
Thank you all. This discussion is very helpful. It sounds like I can wait for
1.6 though given our development status.
Michael
> On Jun 8, 2018, at 1:08 PM, David Anderson wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I think I see a way to eagerly do full state migration without writing your
> own Operator, but
Hi all,
I think I see a way to eagerly do full state migration without writing your
own Operator, but it's kind of hacky and may have flaws I'm not aware of.
In Flink 1.5 we now have the possibility to connect BroadcastStreams to
KeyedStreams and apply a KeyedBroadcastProcessFunction. This is rel
Hi,
Yes it should be feasible. As I said before, with Flink 1.6 there will be
better way for migrating a state, but for now you either need to lazily convert
the state, or iterate over the keys and do the job manually.
Piotrek
> On 7 Jun 2018, at 15:52, Tony Wei wrote:
>
> Hi Piotrek,
>
> S
Hi Piotrek,
So my question is: is that feasible to migrate state from `ProcessFunction`
to my own operator then use `getKeyedStateBackend()` to migrate the states?
If yes, is there anything I need to be careful with? If no, why and can it
be available in the future? Thank you.
Best Regards,
Tony
Hi,
Oh, I see now. Yes indeed getKeyedStateBackened() is not exposed to the
function and you can not migrate your state that way.
As far as I know yes, at the moment in order to convert everything at once
(without getKeyes you still can implement lazy conversion) you would have to
write your o
Hi Piotrek,
I used `ProcessFunction` to implement it, but it seems that I can't call
`getKeyedStateBackend()` like `WindowOperator` did.
I found that `getKeyedStateBackend()` is the method in
`AbstractStreamOperator` and `ProcessFunction` API didn't extend it.
Dose that mean I can't look up all ke
What function are you implementing and how are you using it?
Usually it’s enough if your function implements RichFunction (or rather extend
from AbstractRichFunction) and then you could use RichFunction#open in the
similar manner as in the code that I posted in previous message. Flink in many
p
Hi Piotrek,
It seems that this was implemented by `Operator` API, which is a more low
level api compared to `Function` API.
Since in `Function` API level we can only migrate state by event triggered,
it is more convenient in this way to migrate state by foreach all keys in
`open()` method.
If I wa
Hi,
General solution for state/schema migration is under development and it might
be released with Flink 1.6.0.
Before that, you need to manually handle the state migration in your operator’s
open method. Lets assume that your OperatorV1 has a state field “stateV1”. Your
OperatorV2 defines fie
We are still pretty new to Flink and I have a conceptual / DevOps question.
When a job is modified and we want to deploy the new version, what is the
preferred method? Our jobs have a lot of keyed state.
If we use snapshots we have old state that may no longer apply to the new
pipeline.
If we
12 matches
Mail list logo
