Hi,
I like the idea, will give it a try.
Thanks,
Arnaud
De : Stephen Connolly
Envoyé : mardi 5 mars 2019 13:55
À : LINZ, Arnaud
Cc : zhijiang ; user
Objet : Re: Checkpoints and catch-up burst (heavy back pressure)
On Tue, 5 Mar 2019 at 12:48, Stephen Connolly
mailto:stephen.alan.conno
to
>> know the “load” of the app, or to determine if checkpointing takes too much
>> time, so that I can do it only on purpose?
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Arnaud
>>
>>
>>
>> *De :* zhijiang
>> *Envoyé :* vendredi 1 mars 201
way, programmatically, to
> know the “load” of the app, or to determine if checkpointing takes too much
> time, so that I can do it only on purpose?
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Arnaud
>
>
>
> *De :* zhijiang
> *Envoyé :* vendredi 1 mars 2019 04:59
> *À :* user ; LI
7;origine
> De : Ken Krugler
> Date : ven., mars 01, 2019 7:05 PM +0100
> A : "LINZ, Arnaud"
> CC : zhijiang , user
> Objet : Re: Checkpoints and catch-up burst (heavy back pressure)
>
> Hi Arnaud,
>
> 1. What’s your checkpoint configuration? Wond
01, 2019 7:05 PM +0100
A : "LINZ, Arnaud"
CC : zhijiang , user
Objet : Re: Checkpoints and catch-up burst (heavy back pressure)
Hi Arnaud,
1. What’s your checkpoint configuration? Wondering if you’re writing to HDFS,
and thus the load you’re putting on it while catching up & ch
er
Objet : RE: Checkpoints and catch-up burst (heavy back pressure)
Hi,
I think I should go into more details to explain my use case.
I have one non parallel source (parallelism = 1) that list binary files in a
HDFS directory. DataSet emitted by the source is a data set of file names, not
file content.
Arnaud
Objet : Re: Checkpoints and catch-up burst (heavy back pressure)
Hi Arnaud,
Thanks for the further feedbacks!
For option1: 40min still does not makes sense, which indicates it might take
more time to finish checkpoint in your case. I also experienced some scenarios
of catching up data to ta
.@aliyun.com>>
> Envoyé : vendredi 1 mars 2019 04:59
> À : user mailto:user@flink.apache.org>>; LINZ, Arnaud
> mailto:al...@bouyguestelecom.fr>>
> Objet : Re: Checkpoints and catch-up burst (heavy back pressure)
>
> Hi Arnaud,
>
> Thanks for the furt
iang
--
From:LINZ, Arnaud mailto:al...@bouyguestelecom.fr>>
Send Time:2019年3月1日(星期五) 00:46
To:zhijiang mailto:wangzhijiang...@aliyun.com>>;
user mailto:user@flink.apache.org>>
Subject:RE: Checkpoints and catch-up burst (heavy back pressure)
Update :
Option 1 does not work.
:2019年3月1日(星期五) 00:46
To:zhijiang ; user
Subject:RE: Checkpoints and catch-up burst (heavy back pressure)
Update :
Option 1 does not work. It still fails at the end of the timeout, no matter
its value.
Should I implement a “bandwidth” management system by using artificial
Thread.sleep in the
: 'zhijiang' ; user
Objet : RE: Checkpoints and catch-up burst (heavy back pressure)
Hi Zhihiang,
Thanks for your feedback.
* I’ll try option 1 ; time out is 4min for now, I’ll switch it to 40min and
will let you know. Setting it higher than 40 min does not make much sense since
after
names, everything else is local to the node). Should I adjust their
values nonetheless ? To higher or lower values ?
Best,
Arnaud
De : zhijiang
Envoyé : jeudi 28 février 2019 10:58
À : user ; LINZ, Arnaud
Objet : Re: Checkpoints and catch-up burst (heavy back pressure)
Hi Arnaud,
I think there
Hi Arnaud,
I think there are two key points. First the checkpoint barrier might be emitted
delay from source under high backpressure for synchronizing lock.
Second the barrier has to be queued in flighting data buffers, so the
downstream task has to process all the buffers before barriers to tr
Hello,
I have a simple streaming app that get data from a source and store it to HDFS
using a sink similar to the bucketing file sink. Checkpointing mode is “exactly
once”.
Everything is fine on a “normal” course as the sink is faster than the source;
but when we stop the application for a whil
14 matches
Mail list logo