Re: Better way to read several stream sources

2017-01-25 Thread Sendoh
this message in context: http://apache-flink-user-mailing-list-archive.2336050.n4.nabble.com/Better-way-to-read-several-stream-sources-tp11224p11282.html Sent from the Apache Flink User Mailing List archive. mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Better way to read several stream sources

2017-01-24 Thread Sendoh
x27;t understand SourceFunction and ParallelSourceFunction correctly. Best, Sendoh -- View this message in context: http://apache-flink-user-mailing-list-archive.2336050.n4.nabble.com/Better-way-to-read-several-stream-sources-tp11224p11270.html Sent from the Apache Flink User Mailing List ar

Re: Better way to read several stream sources

2017-01-23 Thread Stephan Ewen
fo("Processing"); > // It won't work, however, a parallel for-loop is fine for > performance concern? > for(FooSource fooSource: fooSourceList) { > fooSource.run(ctx); > } > } > > Best, > > Sendoh > > > > -- > View this message in context: http://apache-flink-user- > mailing-list-archive.2336050.n4.nabble.com/Better-way-to- > read-several-stream-sources-tp11224.html > Sent from the Apache Flink User Mailing List archive. mailing list archive > at Nabble.com. >

Better way to read several stream sources

2017-01-23 Thread Sendoh
} } Best, Sendoh -- View this message in context: http://apache-flink-user-mailing-list-archive.2336050.n4.nabble.com/Better-way-to-read-several-stream-sources-tp11224.html Sent from the Apache Flink User Mailing List archive. mailing list archive at Nabble.com.