Haha :) It arrived, somehow my first mail got sent twice.
On 17.02.2016 20:45, Aljoscha Krettek wrote:
> Hi,
> did the first mail from me not arrive? I’m sending it again:
>
> we changed it a while back to not emit any buffered elements at the end
> because we noticed that that would be a more n
Hi Ajoscha,
thank you for the quick answer and sorry for the double-post.
Cheers,
Konstantin
On 17.02.2016 19:20, Aljoscha Krettek wrote:
> Hi,
> we changed it a while back to not emit any buffered elements at the end
> because we noticed that that would be a more natural behavior. This must b
Hi,
did the first mail from me not arrive? I’m sending it again:
we changed it a while back to not emit any buffered elements at the end because
we noticed that that would be a more natural behavior. This must be an
oversight on our part. I’ll make sure that the 1.0 release will have the
correc
Hi everyone,
if a DataStream is created with .fromElements(...) all windows emit all
buffered records at the end of the stream. I have two questions about this:
1) Is this only the case for streams created with .fromElements() or
does this happen in any streaming application on shutdown?
2) Is t
Hi,
we changed it a while back to not emit any buffered elements at the end because
we noticed that that would be a more natural behavior. This must be an
oversight on our part. I’ll make sure that the 1.0 release will have the
correct behavior.
> On 17 Feb 2016, at 16:35, Konstantin Knauf
> w
Hi everyone,
if a DataStream is created with .fromElements(...) all windows emit all
buffered records at the end of the stream. I have two questions about this:
1) Is this only the case for streams created with .fromElements() or
does this happen in any streaming application on shutdown?
2) Is t
