Re: Backpressure due to busy sub-tasks

2022-12-16 Thread Alexis Sarda-Espinosa
Hi Martijn, yes, that's what I meant, the throughput in the process function(s) didn't change, so even if they were busy 100% of the time with parallelism=2, they were processing data quickly enough. Regards, Alexis. Am Fr., 16. Dez. 2022 um 14:20 Uhr schrieb Martijn Visser < martijnvis...@apach

Re: Backpressure due to busy sub-tasks

2022-12-16 Thread Martijn Visser
Hi, Backpressure implies that it's actually a later operator that is busy. So in this case, that would be your process function that can't handle the incoming load from your Kafka source. Best regards, Martijn On Tue, Dec 13, 2022 at 7:46 PM Alexis Sarda-Espinosa < sarda.espin...@gmail.com> wro

Backpressure due to busy sub-tasks

2022-12-13 Thread Alexis Sarda-Espinosa
Hello, I have a Kafka source (the new one) in Flink 1.15 that's followed by a process function with parallelism=2. Some days, I see long periods of backpressure in the source. During those times, the pool-usage metrics of all tasks stay between 0 and 1%, but the process function appears 100% busy.