Ok, thanks for the pointers Stephan!
Best,
Flavio
On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 4:56 PM, Sebastian wrote:
> These marketing-style comparisons are almost always either wrong, or
>> heavily tainted to make one particular project look good. They are
>> pretty bad style for Apache projects, in my opinion
These marketing-style comparisons are almost always either wrong, or
heavily tainted to make one particular project look good. They are
pretty bad style for Apache projects, in my opinion. For that reason, we
try to make more technical statements and comparisons.
+1
Hi Flavio!
These marketing-style comparisons are almost always either wrong, or
heavily tainted to make one particular project look good. They are pretty
bad style for Apache projects, in my opinion. For that reason, we try to
make more technical statements and comparisons.
There are quite some p
sorry, I forgot to paste it :(
https://www.datatorrent.com/project-apex/
On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 10:10 AM, Fabian Hueske wrote:
> Can you share a link to the comparison?
>
> Thanks, Fabian
>
> 2015-09-28 9:32 GMT+02:00 Flavio Pompermaier :
>
>> Hi to all,
>>
>> I saw this comparison vs Spark, S
Can you share a link to the comparison?
Thanks, Fabian
2015-09-28 9:32 GMT+02:00 Flavio Pompermaier :
> Hi to all,
>
> I saw this comparison vs Spark, Storm and Apache Apex.
> Since I didn't have time to look at the streaming part of Apache Flink, it
> could be interesting to have such a table (
Hi to all,
I saw this comparison vs Spark, Storm and Apache Apex.
Since I didn't have time to look at the streaming part of Apache Flink, it
could be interesting to have such a table (at least for the streaming
features) also for Flink documented somewhere..what do you think?
Best,
Flavio