Thanks for your quick reply.
/Dan
Den ons 2 sep. 2020 kl 12:24 skrev Igal Shilman :
> Hi Dan, let me try to answer your questions:
>
>
>> I guess my question is if one can
>> freely mix Flink core with SF's code with regards to performance,
>> fault-tolerance, and checkpointing?
>
>
> The main l
Hi Dan, let me try to answer your questions:
> I guess my question is if one can
> freely mix Flink core with SF's code with regards to performance,
> fault-tolerance, and checkpointing?
The main limitations at the moment is that, currently SF requires a
processing time watermark semantics only
Hi Dan,
thanks for reaching out to the Flink community. I'm pulling in Gordon and
Igal who will be able to answer your questions.
Cheers,
Till
On Wed, Sep 2, 2020 at 8:22 AM danp wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Nice to see the progress of Stateful functions.
>
> I have a few questions that I hope you can rep
Hi,
Nice to see the progress of Stateful functions.
I have a few questions that I hope you can reply to.
My first question is regarding the newly implemented
StatefulFunctionDataStreamBuilder.
Is there anything to pay attention to if one first union a couple of streams
and performs a sort via a
