+1
> On Aug 2, 2017, at 3:16 PM, Till Rohrmann wrote:
>
> +1
>
> On Wed, Aug 2, 2017 at 9:12 AM, Stefan Richter
> wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> Am 28.07.2017 um 16:03 schrieb Stephan Ewen :
>>
>> Seems like no one raised a concern so far about dropping the savepoint
>> format compatibility for 1.1 i
+1
On Wed, Aug 2, 2017 at 9:12 AM, Stefan Richter
wrote:
> +1
>
> Am 28.07.2017 um 16:03 schrieb Stephan Ewen :
>
> Seems like no one raised a concern so far about dropping the savepoint
> format compatibility for 1.1 in 1.4.
>
> Leaving this thread open for some more days, but from the sentimen
+1
> Am 28.07.2017 um 16:03 schrieb Stephan Ewen :
>
> Seems like no one raised a concern so far about dropping the savepoint format
> compatibility for 1.1 in 1.4.
>
> Leaving this thread open for some more days, but from the sentiment, it seems
> like we should go ahead?
>
> On Wed, Jul 12,
On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 4:03 PM, Stephan Ewen wrote:
> Seems like no one raised a concern so far about dropping the savepoint
> format compatibility for 1.1 in 1.4.
>
> Leaving this thread open for some more days, but from the sentiment, it
> seems like we should go ahead?
+1
Seems like no one raised a concern so far about dropping the savepoint
format compatibility for 1.1 in 1.4.
Leaving this thread open for some more days, but from the sentiment, it
seems like we should go ahead?
On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 4:43 PM, Stephan Ewen wrote:
> Hi users!
>
> Flink currently
Hi Kanstantsin!
Looking at other mail thread, I think you refer to the CEP library API,
correct?
The CEP library has not been labeled as stable yet. The stability
guarantees that we introduced refer to the APIs marked with the `@Public`
interface.
The CEP library was still too much in change/impr
+1 to drop Java 7 support
On 12.07.2017 16:43, Stephan Ewen wrote:
Hi users!
Flink currently maintains backwards compatibility for savepoint
formats, which means that savepoints taken with Flink version 1.1.x
and 1.2.x can be resumed in Flink 1.3.x
We are discussing how many versions back
Hi users!
I can't upgrade from 1.2.x to 1.3.x without code adaptations.
Upgrading from 1.(0|1).x to 1.2.x produces configuration mess.
Maybe you can discuss changing the release plan, speed it up a little
bit and use the major.minor.patch versions as advantage to organize
the release process more
Hi users!
Flink currently maintains backwards compatibility for savepoint formats,
which means that savepoints taken with Flink version 1.1.x and 1.2.x can be
resumed in Flink 1.3.x
We are discussing how many versions back to support. The proposition is the
following:
* Suggestion: Flink 1.4.0
