Thank you for your positive feedback Seth !
Would you please vote in the voting mail thread. Thank you!
Best,
Jincheng
Seth Wiesman 于2020年8月10日周一 下午10:34写道：
> I think this sounds good. +1
>
> On Wed, Aug 5, 2020 at 8:37 PM jincheng sun
> wrote:
>
>> Hi David, Thank you for sharing the problem
I think this sounds good. +1
On Wed, Aug 5, 2020 at 8:37 PM jincheng sun
wrote:
> Hi David, Thank you for sharing the problems with the current document,
> and I agree with you as I also got the same feedback from Chinese users. I
> am often contacted by users to ask questions such as whether Py
Hi David, Thank you for sharing the problems with the current document, and
I agree with you as I also got the same feedback from Chinese users. I am
often contacted by users to ask questions such as whether PyFlink supports
"Java UDF" and whether PyFlink supports "xxxConnector". The root cause of
Hi Xingbo,
Thanks for your information.
I think the PySpark's documentation redesigning deserves our attention. It
seems that the Spark community has also begun to treat the user experience of
Python documentation more seriously. We can continue to pay attention to the
discussion and progress
Hi,
I found that the spark community is also working on redesigning pyspark
documentation[1] recently. Maybe we can compare the difference between our
document structure and its document structure.
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-31851
http://apache-spark-developers-list.1001551.n
I'm delighted to see energy going into improving the documentation.
With the current documentation, I get a lot of questions that I believe
reflect two fundamental problems with what we currently provide:
(1) We have a lot of contextual information in our heads about how Flink
works, and we are a
Hi Seth and David,
I'm very happy to have your reply and suggestions. I would like to share my
thoughts here:
The main motivation we want to refactor the PyFlink doc is that we want to
make sure that the Python users could find all they want starting from the
PyFlink documentation mainpage. That’
Jincheng,
One thing that I like about the way that the documentation is currently
organized is that it's relatively straightforward to compare the Python API
with the Java and Scala versions. I'm concerned that if the PyFlink docs
are more independent, it will be challenging to respond to question
Hi Jincheng,
I'm very excited to see the enthusiasm for documentation work but I am
concerned about the communities long term ability to maintain this
contribution. In particular, I'm concerned that this proposal duplicates a
lot of content that will quickly get out of sync. So far the community d
Would be great if you could join the contribution of PyFlink
documentation @Marta !
Thanks for all of the positive feedback. I will start a formal vote then
later...
Best,
Jincheng
Shuiqiang Chen 于2020年8月3日周一 上午9:56写道：
> Hi jincheng,
>
> Thanks for the discussion. +1 for the FLIP.
>
> A well-o
Hi jincheng,
Thanks for the discussion. +1 for the FLIP.
A well-organized documentation will greatly improve the efficiency and
experience for developers.
Best,
Shuiqiang
Hequn Cheng 于2020年8月1日周六 上午8:42写道：
> Hi Jincheng,
>
> Thanks a lot for raising the discussion. +1 for the FLIP.
>
> I thin
Hi Jincheng,
Thanks a lot for raising the discussion. +1 for the FLIP.
I think this will bring big benefits for the PyFlink users. Currently, the
Python TableAPI document is hidden deeply under the TableAPI&SQL tab which
makes it quite unreadable. Also, the PyFlink documentation is mixed with
Jav
Hi, Jincheng!
Thanks for creating this detailed FLIP, it will make a big difference in
the experience of Python developers using Flink. I'm interested in
contributing to this work, so I'll reach out to you offline!
Also, thanks for sharing some information on the adoption of PyFlink, it's
great t
Hi Jincheng,
Thanks a lot for bringing up this discussion and the proposal.
Big +1 for improving the structure of PyFlink doc.
It will be very friendly to give PyFlink users a unified entrance to learn
PyFlink documents.
Best,
Xingbo
Dian Fu 于2020年7月31日周五 上午11:00写道：
> Hi Jincheng,
>
> Thanks
Hi Jincheng,
Thanks a lot for bringing up this discussion and the proposal. +1 to improve
the Python API doc.
I have received many feedbacks from PyFlink beginners about the PyFlink doc,
e.g. the materials are too few, the Python doc is mixed with the Java doc and
it's not easy to find the doc
Hi folks,
Since the release of Flink 1.11, users of PyFlink have continued to grow.
As far as I know there are many companies have used PyFlink for data
analysis, operation and maintenance monitoring business has been put into
production(Such as 聚美优品[1](Jumei), 浙江墨芷[2] (Mozhi) etc.). According t
16 matches
Mail list logo
