Hello David,
> That is just to avoid falling back to Kryo serialization, which is less effective, but this IMO shouldn't break your application.
Thanks for that hint. I would have spend some hours working on that without fixing my issue.
> Maybe can you try to check these for possible null values
Hi Suchithra,
there is currently no plan on doing another 1.12 release
D.
On Sat 8. 1. 2022 at 18:02, V N, Suchithra (Nokia - IN/Bangalore) <
suchithra@nokia.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>
> When can we expect the flink 1.12 releases with log4j 2.17.1?
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Suchithra
>
>
>
> *From:*
Hi,
When can we expect the flink 1.12 releases with log4j 2.17.1?
Thanks,
Suchithra
From: Martijn Visser
Sent: Thursday, January 6, 2022 7:45 PM
To: patrick.eif...@sony.com
Cc: David Morávek ; swamy.haj...@gmail.com;
subharaj.ma...@gmail.com; V N, Suchithra (Nokia - IN/Bangalore)
; Chesnay Sc
Hi Yun,
Thank you for your reply! testB.jar doesn't have the same entry class as
testA.jar.
So is it expected behavior? What is the theory behind?
Thanks,
Qihua
On Fri, Jan 7, 2022 at 4:27 PM Yun Gao wrote:
>
> Hi Qihua
>
> Sorry may I double confirm that whether the entry class exists in both
Hey Team,
I have a flow like Kafka Sink Datastream -> Process Function (Separate
Class) -> DBSink(Separate Class).
Process Function returns me the output as a string and now I want to create
a DataStream out of the string variable so that I can call something like
ds.addSink(new DBSink()). For th
>
> What I understand from the docs [1] and David A. answer on SO [2] is, that
> I have to create for my POJOs with Lists and Maps TypeInfos.
>
That is just to avoid falling back to Kryo serialization, which is less
effective, but this IMO shouldn't break your application. There might be of
course
Hello Team,
Could you please help us in below question.
Regards,
Deepti Sharma
PMPR & ITIL
From: Deepti Sharma S
Sent: Friday, January 7, 2022 11:58 AM
To: user@flink.apache.org
Subject: Flink upgrade and rollback query
Importance: High
Hello Team,
We are using Flink 1.
Hi David,
It happened due to lack of patience. I apologise.
On Sat, Jan 8, 2022 at 3:06 PM David Morávek
wrote:
> I just have to answer to this.
>
> This was again cross posted on stackoverflow [1]. I think you seriously
> need to rethink your behavior here. The cross posting is one thing, but
I just have to answer to this.
This was again cross posted on stackoverflow [1]. I think you seriously
need to rethink your behavior here. The cross posting is one thing, but
creating a second "fake" email, so you can repeat the behavior you've been
discouraged from [2], makes me feel that you don
