Hi Tison,
Big +1 for the Chinese Weekly Community Update. The content is well-organized,
and I believe it would be very helpful for Chinese users to get an overview of
what’s going on in the community.
Best,
Paul Lam
> 在 2019年8月19日，12:27，Zili Chen 写道：
>
> Hi community,
>
> Inspired by weekl
Hi community,
Inspired by weekly community updates thread, regards the growth
of Chinese community and kind of different concerns for community
members I'd like to start a personally maintained Chinese version of
Weekly Community Update.
Right now I posted these weeks' updates on this page[1] whe
Hi
Currently, we can't change a running job's checkpoint timeout, but there is
an issue[1] which wants to set a separate timeout for savepoint.
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-9465
Best,
Congxian
Aaron Levin 于2019年8月17日周六 上午12:37写道：
> Hello,
>
> Question: Is it possible to upd
Hi,
I would suggest you upgrade flink to 1.7.x and flink-s3-fs-hadoop to 1.7.2.
You might be facing this issue:
- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-11496
- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-11302
Kind regards
Ayush Verma
On Sun, Aug 18, 2019 at 6:02 PM taher koitawala
We used EMR version 5.20 which has Flink 1.6.2 and all other libraries were
according to this version. So flink-s3-fs-hadoop was 1.6.2 as well.
On Sun, Aug 18, 2019, 9:55 PM Ayush Verma wrote:
> Hello, could you tell us the version of flink-s3-fs-hadoop library that
> you are using ?
>
> On Sun
Hello, could you tell us the version of flink-s3-fs-hadoop library that you
are using ?
On Sun 18 Aug 2019 at 16:24, taher koitawala wrote:
> Hi Swapnil,
>We faced this problem once, I think changing checkpoint dir to hdfs
> and keeping sink dir to s3 with EMRFS s3 consistency enabled so
Hi Swapnil,
We faced this problem once, I think changing checkpoint dir to hdfs
and keeping sink dir to s3 with EMRFS s3 consistency enabled solves this
problem. If you are not using emr then I don't know how else it can be
solved. But in a nutshell because EMRFS s3 consistency uses Dynamo D
My first guess would also be the same as Rafi's: The lifetime of the MPU
part files is so too low for that use case.
Maybe this can help:
- If you want to stop a job with a savepoint and plan to restore later
from it (possible much later, so that the MPU Part lifetime might be
exceeded), then
