Re: Remove SQL logging in M2 or M3

2008-02-06 Thread Alexander Lamb (dev)
Yes, it is probably the case Log4J is initialized earlier. We are running Tapestry 5 in a Jetty server. Now the trick will be to find out how and where to catch the initialization and have it take into account our properties file. Alex Le 6 févr. 08 à 18:31, Andrus Adamchik a écrit : If I

Re: Remove SQL logging in M2 or M3

2008-02-06 Thread Andrus Adamchik
If I am not mistaken your conversion pattern "[%p] %c{1} %m%n" does not match the output, so it is very likely that some other dependency and/or container trigger Log4J initialization prior to your code being executed. Andrus On Feb 6, 2008, at 11:57 AM, Alexander Lamb (dev) wrote: Well

Re: Remove SQL logging in M2 or M3

2008-02-06 Thread Alexander Lamb (dev)
Well, I tried but didn't work. Indeed, BEFORE loading a model (I have two models that I load explicitly) I do: public AppModule() { System.out.println(" AppModule init..."); System.out.println("- LOG4J: " + getClass().getResource("/ log4j.properties")); org .apache.log

Re: Remove SQL logging in M2 or M3

2008-02-05 Thread Andrus Adamchik
As a background to what Kevin just said, Cayenne itself no longer attempts to configure Log4J (something it did prior to 3.0). Log4J is optional and is expected to be configured by the user. http://cayenne.apache.org/doc/guide-to-30-features.html (search for "logging" on this page). And

Re: Remove SQL logging in M2 or M3

2008-02-05 Thread Kevin Menard
How are you bootstrapping your log4j configuration? I have something like the following before creating a DC: org.apache.log4j.PropertyConfigurator.configure(getClass().getResource("/log 4j.properties")); -- Kevin On 2/5/08 11:29 AM, "Alexander Lamb (dev)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello