t: Wednesday, May 28, 2008 11:29 PM
To: user@cayenne.apache.org
Subject: Re: Cayenne and JAX-WS / JAXB
Scott,
Thanks so much for the input. It's exactly what I was looking for.
Honestly, I wasn't entirely sure of the approach, either. It seemed
to me to make sense that since we have a data object such
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2008 11:29 PM
To: user@cayenne.apache.org
Subject: Re: Cayenne and JAX-WS / JAXB
Scott,
Thanks so much for the input. It's exactly what I was looking for.
Honestly, I wasn't entirely sure of the approach, either. It seemed
to me to mak
On 29/05/2008, at 1:29 PM, Jon Sharp wrote:
Thanks so much for the input. It's exactly what I was looking for.
Honestly, I wasn't entirely sure of the approach, either. It seemed
to me to make sense that since we have a data object such as a
"Campground" that Cayenne has already defined
date all
incoming data. Since you should be validating all incoming data
anyways,
it won't be any extra work for you to take this step.
Regards,
Scott
-Original Message-
From: Jon Sharp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2008 3:30 PM
To: user@cayenne.apache.org
Subj
Message-
From: Scott Anderson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2008 4:05 PM
To: user@cayenne.apache.org
Subject: RE: Cayenne and JAX-WS / JAXB
Jon, what is the reason you wish to do this? What you're proposing
breaks the whole point of making a layer out of persistence;
ng all incoming data anyways,
it won't be any extra work for you to take this step.
Regards,
Scott
-Original Message-
From: Jon Sharp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2008 3:30 PM
To: user@cayenne.apache.org
Subject: Re: Cayenne and JAX-WS / JAXB
Andrus,
Thanks for t
Andrus,
Thanks for the input. I've been playing around with this annotations
approach, but it seems I'm going to have to get into the cayenne
source a bit more than I expected. It looks like I'll need to
annotate the Interfaces themselves (DataObject). I've checked out the
latest Cayen
Yes, that is correct. JAX-WS is just Sun's framework for SOAP web
services, quite similar to Axis.
--
Jon
Jon Sharp
CTO & Senior Engineer
Campground Automation Systems, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(615) 579-5868
www.campgroundautomation.com
On May 27, 2008, at 4:23 AM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
I think the commercial app servers have just stablised on Java 5. I imagine
it will be a while (years) before they are Java 6.
regards Malcolm Edgar
On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 7:23 PM, Andrus Adamchik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> My understanding that this is for the "classic" web services (think A
My understanding that this is for the "classic" web services (think
Axis, etc.)
Andrus
On May 27, 2008, at 11:19 AM, Aristedes Maniatis wrote:
On 27/05/2008, at 9:51 AM, Jon Sharp wrote:
We are using Cayenne 3.0M3 for ORM in our project and are exposing
this database using SOAP Web Service
On 27/05/2008, at 9:51 AM, Jon Sharp wrote:
We are using Cayenne 3.0M3 for ORM in our project and are exposing
this database using SOAP Web Services. We're using the latest Sun
Metro stack (1.2), consisting of the JAX-WS and JAXB frameworks.
I don't know much yet about these technologies,
I never used JAXB, although I evaluated it briefly in the past. With
everyone gradually moving to Java 6, it probably warrants a closer
looks from us in Cayenne. More to the point, I think the annotations
approach should work, but that will require some experimentation. So
try it, and let u
12 matches
Mail list logo
