Hi all,
Transition to Java 8 is part of this pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cayenne/pull/239
Once it's merged Java 7 will be in the past.
On Sun, Jul 30, 2017 at 12:24 PM, Malcolm Edgar wrote:
> +1
>
> regards Malcolm Edgar
>
> On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 6:36 PM, Savv
+1
regards Malcolm Edgar
On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 6:36 PM, Savva Kolbachev
wrote:
> Here is my +1 as well.
>
> On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 11:16 PM, Musall, Maik
> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > > Am 27.07.2017 um 14:35 schrieb Nikita Timofeev <
> > ntimof...@objectstyle.com>:
> > >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
>
Here is my +1 as well.
On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 11:16 PM, Musall, Maik wrote:
> +1
>
> > Am 27.07.2017 um 14:35 schrieb Nikita Timofeev <
> ntimof...@objectstyle.com>:
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > There is discussion on dev@list [1], and I want to mention it here too.
> > The question is simple is it
+1
> Am 27.07.2017 um 14:35 schrieb Nikita Timofeev :
>
> Hi all,
>
> There is discussion on dev@list [1], and I want to mention it here too.
> The question is simple is it time to drop support for Java 7 out of
> Cayenne starting from 4.1 version that is in early development now.
> Thus making
I support it.
On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 5:35 AM, Nikita Timofeev
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> There is discussion on dev@list [1], and I want to mention it here too.
> The question is simple is it time to drop support for Java 7 out of
> Cayenne starting from 4.1 version that is in early development now.
Hi all,
There is discussion on dev@list [1], and I want to mention it here too.
The question is simple is it time to drop support for Java 7 out of
Cayenne starting from 4.1 version that is in early development now.
Thus making 4.0 (that is in BETA) last version with support for Java
7.
Main reas
tps://github.com/apache/cayenne/commit/eac1f31073045fec6eafef3f3fd6cb05f0201994
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 7:03 PM, Hugi Thordarson
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> Thanks Nikita, at least I know I'm not d
Thanks Nikita, at least I know I'm not doing anything wrong then :)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> - hugi
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 24 May 2017, at 14:52, Nikita Timofeev
>>>>>>> wrote:
>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Hugi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Seems like custom types are broken in ColumnSelect, I see this bug in
>>>>>> my test too.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed, May 24, 2017 at
of 4.0.M6-SNAPSHOT. Always living on the edge
>>>>>> :)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> - hugi
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 24 May 2017, at 14:31, Andrus Adamchik
>>>>>>
va8 in your app, and the problem is
>>>>>> specific to just the column select query, you may also need to switch to
>>>>>> M6. IIRC there were some issues in M5 with the behavior that you
>>>>>> describe.
>>>>>>
>>
M5 with the behavior that you describe.
>>>>>
>>>>> Andrus
>>>>>
>>>>>> On May 24, 2017, at 5:28 PM, Andrus Adamchik
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You need to add cayenne-java8 d
gt;>>>>>
>>>>>> You need to add cayenne-java8 dependency.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Unfortunately the fallback behavior (treat unknown class as
>>>>>> Serializable) is extremely confusing. Though I think we log some
chik
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> You need to add cayenne-java8 dependency.
>>>>>
>>>>> Unfortunately the fallback behavior (treat unknown class as Serializable)
>>>>> is extremely con
Andrus Adamchik
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> You need to add cayenne-java8 dependency.
>>>>
>>>> Unfortunately the fallback behavior (treat unknown class as Serializable)
>>>> is extremely confusing. Though I think we log so
h I think we log some warnings before doing
>>> that.
>>>
>>> ANdrus
>>>
>>>
>>>> On May 24, 2017, at 5:20 PM, Hugi Thordarson wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi all,
>>>> if I try to fetch Java 8 date obj
(treat unknown class as Serializable) is
>> extremely confusing. Though I think we log some warnings before doing that.
>>
>> ANdrus
>>
>>
>>> On May 24, 2017, at 5:20 PM, Hugi Thordarson wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi all,
>>> if I t
wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>> if I try to fetch Java 8 date objects using ColumnSelect, the values get
>> returned as byte arrays instead of actual objects. Example:
>>
>> LocalDateTime creationDate = ObjectSelect
>> .query( User.clas
that.
>
> ANdrus
>
>
>> On May 24, 2017, at 5:20 PM, Hugi Thordarson wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>> if I try to fetch Java 8 date objects using ColumnSelect, the values get
>> returned as byte arrays instead of actual objects. Example:
>>
>> Loca
try to fetch Java 8 date objects using ColumnSelect, the values get
> returned as byte arrays instead of actual objects. Example:
>
> LocalDateTime creationDate = ObjectSelect
> .query( User.class )
> .column( User.CREATION_DATE )
> .sel
Hi all,
if I try to fetch Java 8 date objects using ColumnSelect, the values get
returned as byte arrays instead of actual objects. Example:
LocalDateTime creationDate = ObjectSelect
.query( User.class )
.column( User.CREATION_DATE )
.selectFirst
type (java.time.LocalDateTime) in the
>> model doesn’t seem to work.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> - hugi
>>
>> // Hugi Thordarson
>> // http://www.loftfar.is/ <http://www.loftfar.is/>
>> // s. 895-6688
>>
>>
>>
>>> On 6. ágú. 201
rs,
> - hugi
>
> // Hugi Thordarson
> // http://www.loftfar.is/ <http://www.loftfar.is/>
> // s. 895-6688
>
>
>
> > On 6. ágú. 2015, at 08:58, Savva Kolbachev
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Hugi,
> >
> > Cayenne already has a Java 8 module, which includ
ágú. 2015, at 08:58, Savva Kolbachev wrote:
>
> Hi Hugi,
>
> Cayenne already has a Java 8 module, which includes all necessary extended
> types for the new Java 8 Date/Time API.
> So feel free to use it.
>
> 2015-08-06 11:17 GMT+03:00 Hugi Thordarson :
>
>> Hi al
Hi Hugi,
Cayenne already has a Java 8 module, which includes all necessary extended
types for the new Java 8 Date/Time API.
So feel free to use it.
2015-08-06 11:17 GMT+03:00 Hugi Thordarson :
> Hi all.
>
> I’m starting new project and I’m pondering using the new Java 8 Date/Time
>
Hi all.
I’m starting new project and I’m pondering using the new Java 8 Date/Time API’s
in the data model. Is anyone using them already with Cayenne, and if so, any
words of warning (or words of encouragement :)?
Cheers,
- hugi
// Hugi Thordarson
// http://www.loftfar.is/ <h
26 matches
Mail list logo
