Re: Cayenne and JAX-WS / JAXB / GWT

2008-05-30 Thread Jon Sharp
t: Wednesday, May 28, 2008 11:29 PM To: user@cayenne.apache.org Subject: Re: Cayenne and JAX-WS / JAXB Scott, Thanks so much for the input. It's exactly what I was looking for. Honestly, I wasn't entirely sure of the approach, either. It seemed to me to make sense that since we have a data object such

RE: Cayenne and JAX-WS / JAXB / GWT

2008-05-29 Thread Scott Anderson
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2008 11:29 PM To: user@cayenne.apache.org Subject: Re: Cayenne and JAX-WS / JAXB Scott, Thanks so much for the input. It's exactly what I was looking for. Honestly, I wasn't entirely sure of the approach, either. It seemed to me to mak

Re: Cayenne and JAX-WS / JAXB

2008-05-28 Thread Aristedes Maniatis
On 29/05/2008, at 1:29 PM, Jon Sharp wrote: Thanks so much for the input. It's exactly what I was looking for. Honestly, I wasn't entirely sure of the approach, either. It seemed to me to make sense that since we have a data object such as a "Campground" that Cayenne has already defined

Re: Cayenne and JAX-WS / JAXB

2008-05-28 Thread Jon Sharp
date all incoming data. Since you should be validating all incoming data anyways, it won't be any extra work for you to take this step. Regards, Scott -Original Message- From: Jon Sharp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2008 3:30 PM To: user@cayenne.apache.org Subj

RE: Cayenne and JAX-WS / JAXB

2008-05-28 Thread Scott Anderson
Message- From: Scott Anderson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2008 4:05 PM To: user@cayenne.apache.org Subject: RE: Cayenne and JAX-WS / JAXB Jon, what is the reason you wish to do this? What you're proposing breaks the whole point of making a layer out of persistence;

RE: Cayenne and JAX-WS / JAXB

2008-05-28 Thread Scott Anderson
ng all incoming data anyways, it won't be any extra work for you to take this step. Regards, Scott -Original Message- From: Jon Sharp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2008 3:30 PM To: user@cayenne.apache.org Subject: Re: Cayenne and JAX-WS / JAXB Andrus, Thanks for t

Re: Cayenne and JAX-WS / JAXB

2008-05-28 Thread Jon Sharp
Andrus, Thanks for the input. I've been playing around with this annotations approach, but it seems I'm going to have to get into the cayenne source a bit more than I expected. It looks like I'll need to annotate the Interfaces themselves (DataObject). I've checked out the latest Cayen

Re: Cayenne and JAX-WS / JAXB

2008-05-28 Thread Jon Sharp
Yes, that is correct. JAX-WS is just Sun's framework for SOAP web services, quite similar to Axis. -- Jon Jon Sharp CTO & Senior Engineer Campground Automation Systems, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] (615) 579-5868 www.campgroundautomation.com On May 27, 2008, at 4:23 AM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:

RE: Java 6 [Was: Cayenne and JAX-WS / JAXB]

2008-05-27 Thread Scott Anderson
--Original Message- From: Michael Gentry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2008 9:25 AM To: user@cayenne.apache.org Subject: Re: Java 6 [Was: Cayenne and JAX-WS / JAXB] That seems like a rather short period for Java 1.5. We are just now starting to incorporate some Java 1.5 featur

Re: Java 6 [Was: Cayenne and JAX-WS / JAXB]

2008-05-27 Thread Michael Gentry
That seems like a rather short period for Java 1.5. We are just now starting to incorporate some Java 1.5 features here (I convinced them to switch). Java 1.6 is not an option here yet (Apple didn't release it for Tiger). I guess we'll get squeezed by Sun and Apple. :-) I'm kind of looking for

Java 6 [Was: Cayenne and JAX-WS / JAXB]

2008-05-27 Thread Andrus Adamchik
I don't disagree with that (although check the EOL note here [1]), still this shouldn't matter. Consider that Cayenne being Java 1.4 in the recent past did not prevent us from fully supporting enums. The mechanism to develop and test multi-JDK extensions is there, so if we see a benefit, we

Re: Cayenne and JAX-WS / JAXB

2008-05-27 Thread Malcolm Edgar
I think the commercial app servers have just stablised on Java 5. I imagine it will be a while (years) before they are Java 6. regards Malcolm Edgar On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 7:23 PM, Andrus Adamchik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > My understanding that this is for the "classic" web services (think A

Re: Cayenne and JAX-WS / JAXB

2008-05-27 Thread Andrus Adamchik
My understanding that this is for the "classic" web services (think Axis, etc.) Andrus On May 27, 2008, at 11:19 AM, Aristedes Maniatis wrote: On 27/05/2008, at 9:51 AM, Jon Sharp wrote: We are using Cayenne 3.0M3 for ORM in our project and are exposing this database using SOAP Web Service

Re: Cayenne and JAX-WS / JAXB

2008-05-27 Thread Aristedes Maniatis
On 27/05/2008, at 9:51 AM, Jon Sharp wrote: We are using Cayenne 3.0M3 for ORM in our project and are exposing this database using SOAP Web Services. We're using the latest Sun Metro stack (1.2), consisting of the JAX-WS and JAXB frameworks. I don't know much yet about these technologies,

Re: Cayenne and JAX-WS / JAXB

2008-05-27 Thread Andrus Adamchik
I never used JAXB, although I evaluated it briefly in the past. With everyone gradually moving to Java 6, it probably warrants a closer looks from us in Cayenne. More to the point, I think the annotations approach should work, but that will require some experimentation. So try it, and let u

Cayenne and JAX-WS / JAXB

2008-05-26 Thread Jon Sharp
Hello all, We are using Cayenne 3.0M3 for ORM in our project and are exposing this database using SOAP Web Services. We're using the latest Sun Metro stack (1.2), consisting of the JAX-WS and JAXB frameworks. In attempting to use Cayenne Data objects as either return types or method par